Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28108468›Full record

ArticleGut2018

Metabolic biomarker signature to differentiate pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from chronic pancreatitis.

Julia Mayerle, Holger Kalthoff, Regina Reszka, Beate Kamlage, Erik Peter, Bodo Schniewind, Sandra González Maldonado, Christian Pilarsky, Claus-Dieter Heidecke, Philipp Schatz and 6 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04164602 (New Onset of DiabetEs in aSsociation With Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 154 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
154citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04164602 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

New Onset of DiabetEs in aSsociation With Pancreatic Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of PecsRan2019 to 2025Enrolled2,522ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetes type2
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

154 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 330 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Catching pancreatic cancer early: Are we there yet?Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

94 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Julia MayerleDepartment of Medicine A, University Medicine, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Holger KalthoffSection for Molecular Oncology, Institut for Experimental Cancer Research (IET), UKSH, Kiel, Germany.
Regina ReszkaMetanomics Health GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Beate KamlageMetanomics Health GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Erik PeterMetanomics Health GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Bodo SchniewindSection for Molecular Oncology, Institut for Experimental Cancer Research (IET), UKSH, Kiel, Germany.
Sandra González Maldonadometanomics GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Christian PilarskyDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
Claus-Dieter HeideckeDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery University Medicine Greifswald, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University, Greifswald, Germany.
Philipp SchatzMetanomics Health GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Marius DistlerClinic and Outpatient Clinic for Visceral-, Thorax- and Vascular Surgery, Medizinische Fakultät, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Jonas A ScheiberDepartment of Medicine A, University Medicine, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Ujjwal M MahajanDepartment of Medicine A, University Medicine, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
F Ulrich WeissDepartment of Medicine A, University Medicine, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Robert GrützmannDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
Markus M LerchDepartment of Medicine A, University Medicine, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Universität Greifswald · DEInstitute of Clinical Cancer Research · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DELMU Klinikum · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DETU Dresden · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCurrent non-invasive diagnostic tests can distinguish between pancreatic cancer (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) in only about two thirds of patients. We have searched for blood-derived metabolite biomarkers for this diagnostic purpose.

designFor a case-control study in three tertiary referral centres, 914 subjects were prospectively recruited with PDAC (n=271), CP (n=282), liver cirrhosis (n=100) or healthy as well as non-pancreatic disease controls (n=261) in three consecutive studies. Metabolomic profiles of plasma and serum samples were generated from 477 metabolites identified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

resultsA biomarker signature (nine metabolites and additionally CA19-9) was identified for the differential diagnosis between PDAC and CP. The biomarker signature distinguished PDAC from CP in the training set with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.96 (95% CI 0.93-0.98). The biomarker signature cut-off of 0.384 at 85% fixed specificity showed a sensitivity of 94.9% (95% CI 87.0%-97.0%). In the test set, an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.97) and, using the same cut-off, a sensitivity of 89.9% (95% CI 81.0%-95.5%) and a specificity of 91.3% (95% CI 82.8%-96.4%) were achieved, successfully validating the biomarker signature.

conclusionsIn patients with CP with an increased risk for pancreatic cancer (cumulative incidence 1.95%), the performance of this biomarker signature results in a negative predictive value of 99.9% (95% CI 99.7%-99.9%) (training set) and 99.8% (95% CI 99.6%-99.9%) (test set). In one third of our patients, the clinical use of this biomarker signature would have improved diagnosis and treatment stratification in comparison to CA19-9.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCase-Control StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialEarly Detection of CancerFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMetabolomicsMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreatitis, ChronicBiomarkers, TumorPANCREATIC CANCERPANCREATITIS

Identifiers

PMID28108468
PMCPMC5754849
OpenAlexW2575543752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.