ArticleGut2018
Metabolic biomarker signature to differentiate pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from chronic pancreatitis.
Article in Gut, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04164602 (New Onset of DiabetEs in aSsociation With Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 154 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
New Onset of DiabetEs in aSsociation With Pancreatic Cancer
Who cites it
154 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 330 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of novel biomarkers in the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Integration of metabolites from meta-analysis with transcriptome reveals enhanced SPHK1 in PDAC with a background of pancreatitis.BMC cancer · 2022Pooled it
- The underexplored links between cancer and the internal body climate: Implications for cancer prevention and treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- A systematic review on metabolomics-based diagnostic biomarker discovery and validation in pancreatic cancer.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2018Pooled it
- Pancreatic Cancer Early Detection Biomarkers for High-Risk Individuals: Insights From the PRECEDE Consortium.International journal of cancer · 2026Review
- Detection of Pancreatic Cancer via Specific Metabolite Markers: A Metabolomics Approach.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Metabolic and Inflammatory Risk Stratification in Resected Cholangiocarcinoma: A Retrospective Exploratory Analysis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Breaking barriers: nano-boosted drug delivery systems in overcoming the defenses of pancreatic cancer.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Histidine to glutamine substitutants, a regulated process that impacts cell survival and suggests histidine shortage in cancer.Cell death discovery · 2026Article
- Extracellular vesicle and particle biomarkers in cancer: a machine learning blueprint for liquid biopsy.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Liquid Biopsy Differentiation of Pancreatic Cancer From Non-Cancerous Pancreatic Disease Using Dielectrophoresis-Recovered Nanoparticles Carrying Cell-Free DNA and Protein Biomarkers.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Catching pancreatic cancer early: Are we there yet?Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026Review
- PanMETAI - a high performance tabular foundation model for accurate pancreatic cancer diagnosis via NMR metabolomics.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- From dysbiosis to tumorigenesis: microbiome-derived metabolites as emerging cancer biomarkers.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Current challenges in screening for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an appraisal of the METAPAC study.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Gastrointestinal cancer: molecular pathogenesis and targeted therapy.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
- CA19-9 as a Dynamic Biomarker for Continuous Monitoring of Therapeutic Efficacy in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.Cancers · 2025Review
- Lipidomic profiling of human bile distinguishes cholangiocarcinoma from benign bile duct diseases with high specificity and sensitivity: a prospective descriptive study.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Development and validation of an easy-to-use nomogram for predicting pancreatic malignancy in patients with pancreatic mass.Scientific reports · 2025Article
94 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issuedCorrection:2018
Authors and funding
16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCurrent non-invasive diagnostic tests can distinguish between pancreatic cancer (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) in only about two thirds of patients. We have searched for blood-derived metabolite biomarkers for this diagnostic purpose.
designFor a case-control study in three tertiary referral centres, 914 subjects were prospectively recruited with PDAC (n=271), CP (n=282), liver cirrhosis (n=100) or healthy as well as non-pancreatic disease controls (n=261) in three consecutive studies. Metabolomic profiles of plasma and serum samples were generated from 477 metabolites identified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
resultsA biomarker signature (nine metabolites and additionally CA19-9) was identified for the differential diagnosis between PDAC and CP. The biomarker signature distinguished PDAC from CP in the training set with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.96 (95% CI 0.93-0.98). The biomarker signature cut-off of 0.384 at 85% fixed specificity showed a sensitivity of 94.9% (95% CI 87.0%-97.0%). In the test set, an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.97) and, using the same cut-off, a sensitivity of 89.9% (95% CI 81.0%-95.5%) and a specificity of 91.3% (95% CI 82.8%-96.4%) were achieved, successfully validating the biomarker signature.
conclusionsIn patients with CP with an increased risk for pancreatic cancer (cumulative incidence 1.95%), the performance of this biomarker signature results in a negative predictive value of 99.9% (95% CI 99.7%-99.9%) (training set) and 99.8% (95% CI 99.6%-99.9%) (test set). In one third of our patients, the clinical use of this biomarker signature would have improved diagnosis and treatment stratification in comparison to CA19-9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.