Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28108306›Full record

ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2017

Bone remodeling as a spatial evolutionary game.

Marc D Ryser, Kevin A Murgas

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Relevance of Notch Signaling for Bone Metabolism and Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Spatial evolutionary games with weak selection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marc D RyserDepartment of Mathematics, Duke University, 120 Science Drive, 117 Physics Building, Durham, NC 27708 USA. Electronic address: ryser@math.duke.edu.
Kevin A MurgasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University · US

Funding

Mathematical Models of Cancer Initiation, Progression, and Resistance to TherapyR01GM096190 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DURRETT, RICK · 2010 to 2013
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM096190
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone remodeling is a complex process involving cell-cell interactions, biochemical signaling and mechanical stimuli. Early models of the biological aspects of remodeling were non-spatial and focused on the local dynamics at a fixed location in the bone. Several spatial extensions of these models have been proposed, but they generally suffer from two limitations: first, they are not amenable to analysis and are computationally expensive, and second, they neglect the role played by bone-embedded osteocytes. To address these issues, we developed a novel model of spatial remodeling based on the principles of evolutionary game theory. The analytically tractable framework describes the spatial interactions between zones of bone resorption, bone formation and quiescent bone, and explicitly accounts for regulation of remodeling by bone-embedded, mechanotransducing osteocytes. Using tools from the theory of interacting particle systems we systematically classified the different dynamic regimes of the spatial model and identified regions of parameter space that allow for global coexistence of resorption, formation and quiescence, as observed in physiological remodeling. In coexistence scenarios, three-dimensional simulations revealed the emergence of sponge-like bone clusters. Comparison between spatial and non-spatial dynamics revealed substantial differences and suggested a stabilizing role of space. Our findings emphasize the importance of accounting for spatial structure and bone-embedded osteocytes when modeling the process of bone remodeling. Thanks to the lattice-based framework, the proposed model can easily be coupled to a mechanical model of bone loading.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionComputer SimulationAnimalsBone RemodelingHumansMechanotransduction, CellularOsteocytesBone physiologyInteracting particle systemsOsteoblastsOsteoclastsOsteocytesSpatial evolutionary gamesTrabecular remodeling

Identifiers

PMID28108306
PMCPMC5362252
OpenAlexW2517413520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.