Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28108195›Full record

ArticleToxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA2017

The virtual cell based assay: Current status and future perspectives.

Rabea Graepel, Lara Lamon, David Asturiol, Elisabet Berggren, Elisabeth Joossens, Alicia Paini, Pilar Prieto, Maurice Whelan, Andrew Worth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Virtual cell: Current perspectives and future prospects.The Journal of international medical research · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Incorporating new approach methods (NAMs) data in dose-response assessments: The future is now!Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2025
    Review
  5. Toward Realistic DosimetryChemical research in toxicology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bridging the Data Gap FromFrontiers in public health · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rabea GraepelChemical Safety and Alternative Methods Unit incorporating EURL ECVAM, Directorate Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
Lara LamonChemical Safety and Alternative Methods Unit incorporating EURL ECVAM, Directorate Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy. Electronic address: lara.lamon@ec.europa.eu.
David AsturiolChemical Safety and Alternative Methods Unit incorporating EURL ECVAM, Directorate Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
Elisabet BerggrenChemical Safety and Alternative Methods Unit incorporating EURL ECVAM, Directorate Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
Elisabeth JoossensChemical Safety and Alternative Methods Unit incorporating EURL ECVAM, Directorate Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
Alicia PainiChemical Safety and Alternative Methods Unit incorporating EURL ECVAM, Directorate Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
Pilar PrietoChemical Safety and Alternative Methods Unit incorporating EURL ECVAM, Directorate Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
Maurice WhelanChemical Safety and Alternative Methods Unit incorporating EURL ECVAM, Directorate Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
Andrew WorthChemical Safety and Alternative Methods Unit incorporating EURL ECVAM, Directorate Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to replace the use of animals in toxicity testing, there is a need to predict in vivo toxic doses from concentrations that cause toxicological effects in relevant in vitro systems. The Virtual Cell Based Assay (VCBA) estimates time-dependent concentration of a test chemical in the cell and cell culture for a given in vitro system. The concentrations in the different compartments of the cell and test system are derived from ordinary differential equations, physicochemical parameters of the test chemical and properties of the cell line. The VCBA has been developed for a range of cell lines including BALB/c 3T3 cells, HepG2, HepaRG, lung A459 cells, and cardiomyocytes. The model can be used to design and refine in vitro experiments and extrapolate in vitro effective concentrations to in vivo doses that can be applied in risk assessment. In this paper, we first discuss potential applications of the VCBA: i) design of in vitro High Throughput Screening (HTS) experiments; ii) hazard identification (based on acute systemic toxicity); and iii) risk assessment. Further extension of the VCBA is discussed in the second part, exploring potential application to i) manufactured nanomaterials, ii) additional cell lines and endpoints, and considering iii) other opportunities.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalRisk AssessmentAnimalsCell LineHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansChemical fateIn vitroNanomaterialToxicityVCBAVirtual cell

Identifiers

PMID28108195
PMCPMC5742635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.