GuidelineChest2017
Symptomatic Treatment of Cough Among Adult Patients With Lung Cancer: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.
Guideline in Chest, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Guideline for Medication Management of Distressing Symptoms in Older Patients Receiving End-of-Life Palliative Care.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2026Guideline
- Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Cough in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Pooled it
- Recommendations for Interventions to Improve Function in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Clinical Practice Guideline.Cancer medicine · 2025Guideline
- A systematic review of rehabilitation and exercise recommendations in oncology guidelines.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians · 2021Pooled it
- Effects of behavioural speech therapy on postoperative cough and cough-related quality of life of lung cancer patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Trial
- Pregabalin for chronic cough due to lung cancer: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.British journal of cancer · 2025Trial
- Resiliency among older adults receiving lung cancer treatment (ROAR-LCT): A novel supportive care intervention for older adults with advanced lung cancer.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2024Trial
- Review
- Innovative Tools and Perspectives in Cough Management: Cancer and Cough.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2026Review
- Symptom Cluster Trajectories of Cough, Shortness of Breath, and Disturbed Sleep in Patients Undergoing Lung Cancer Surgery: A Longitudinal Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Cloperastine in paediatric and adult cough management: a historical narrative review.Drugs in context · 2026Review
- Analysis of the Effectiveness of a Total Management Model in the Management of Chronic Cough After Lung Cancer Surgery.Thoracic cancer · 2025Article
- Review
- Patient's experiences of coughing after lung cancer surgery: A multicenter qualitative study.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Principles of Palliative and Supportive Care in Pancreatic Cancer: A Review.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Efficacy of gefapixant, a P2XThe Journal of international medical research · 2023Article
- Cough hypersensitivity and chronic cough.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022Review
- Evaluation of Cough Medication Use Patterns in Ambulatory Care Settings in the United States: 2003-2018.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Enabling patients in effective self-management of breathlessness in lung cancer: the neglected pillar of personalized medicine.Lung cancer management · 2021Review
- Revised Korean Cough Guidelines, 2020: Recommendations and Summary Statements.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCough among patients with lung cancer is a common but often undertreated symptom. We used a 2015 Cochrane systematic review, among other sources of evidence, to update the recommendations and suggestions of the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) 2006 guideline on this topic.
methodsThe CHEST methodologic guidelines and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework were used. The Expert Cough Panel based their recommendations on data from the Cochrane systematic review on the topic, uncontrolled studies, case studies, and the clinical context. Final grading was reached by consensus according to the Delphi method.
resultsThe Cochrane systematic review identified 17 trials of primarily low-quality evidence. Such evidence was related to both nonpharmacologic (cough suppression) and pharmacologic (demulcents, opioids, peripherally acting antitussives, or local anesthetics) treatments, as well as endobronchial brachytherapy.
conclusionsCompared with the 2006 CHEST Cough Guideline, the current recommendations and suggestions are more specific and follow a step-up approach to the management of cough among patients with lung cancer, acknowledging the low-quality evidence in the field and the urgent need to develop more effective, evidence-based interventions through high-quality research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.