Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28106345›Full record

Trial reportMolecular oncology2017

Blood-based detection of RAS mutations to guide anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer patients: concordance of results from circulating tumor DNA and tissue-based RAS testing.

Wolff Schmiegel, Rodney J Scott, Susan Dooley, Wendy Lewis, Cliff J Meldrum, Peter Pockney, Brian Draganic, Steve Smith, Chelsee Hewitt, Hazel Philimore and 27 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Concordance of blood- and tumor-based detection of RAS mutations to guide anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2017
    Trial
  7. Review
  8. The temporal evaluation of RAS mutation by liquid biopsy at progression after bevacizumab-based treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Network approach in liquidomics landscape.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evaluation ofCells · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

Wolff SchmiegelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Bochum Hospital, Germany.
Rodney J ScottPathology North, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Susan DooleyPathology North, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Wendy LewisPathology North, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Cliff J MeldrumPathology North, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Peter PockneyThe Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Newcastle, Australia.
Brian DraganicThe Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Newcastle, Australia.
Steve SmithThe Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Newcastle, Australia.
Chelsee HewittPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Hazel PhilimorePeter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Amanda LucasPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Elva ShiPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Kateh NamdarianPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Timmy ChanPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Danilo AcostaPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Su Ping-ChangPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Andrea TannapfelInstitute of Pathology, University of Bochum Hospital, Germany.
Anke Reinacher-SchickDivision of Hematolgy and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany.
Waldemar UhlDepartment of Visceral and General Surgery, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany.
Christian TeschendorfDepartment of Internal Medicine, St. Josefs-Hospital, Dortmund, Germany.
Heiner WoltersDepartment of Visceral and General Surgery, St. Josefs-Hospital, Dortmund, Germany.
Josef SternDepartment of Visceral and General Surgery, St. Josefs-Hospital, Dortmund, Germany.
Richard ViebahnDepartment of Visceral and General Surgery, Medical University of Bochum Hospital, Germany.
Helmut FriessDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Germany.
Klaus-Peter JanssenDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Germany.
Ulrich NitscheDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Germany.
Julia Slotta-HuspeninaDepartment of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Germany.
Michael PohlDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Bochum Hospital, Germany.
Deepak VangalaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Bochum Hospital, Germany.
Alexander BaraniskinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Bochum Hospital, Germany.
Barbara Dockhorn-DworniczakCentre of Pathology, Kempten, Germany.
Susanne Hegewisch-BeckerCentre of Haemato-Oncology, Hamburg, Germany.
Philippe RongaGlobal Medical Affairs Oncology, Merck KGAa, Darmstadt, Germany.
Daniel L EdelsteinMedical Scientific Affairs, Sysmex Inostics Inc., Mundelein, IL, USA.
Frederick S JonesMedical Scientific Affairs, Sysmex Inostics Inc., Mundelein, IL, USA.
Stephan HahnDepartment of Molecular GI Oncology, University of Bochum Hospital, Germany.
Stephen B FoxPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUJohn Hunter Hospital · AUUniversity Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum · DESt. Josefs Hospital · DETUM Klinikum · DESt. Josef-Hospital · DESysmex (Japan) · JPKempten University of Applied Sciences · DEMerck (Germany) · DEPathologie Hamburg-West · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An accurate blood-based RAS mutation assay to determine eligibility of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients for anti-EGFR therapy would benefit clinical practice by better informing decisions to administer treatment independent of tissue availability. The objective of this study was to determine the level of concordance between plasma and tissue RAS mutation status in patients with mCRC to gauge whether blood-based RAS mutation testing is a viable alternative to standard-of-care RAS tumor testing. RAS testing was performed on plasma samples from newly diagnosed metastatic patients, or from recurrent mCRC patients using the highly sensitive digital PCR technology, BEAMing (beads, emulsions, amplification, and magnetics), and compared with DNA sequencing data of respective FFPE (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded) tumor samples. Discordant tissue RAS results were re-examined by BEAMing, if possible. The prevalence of RAS mutations detected in plasma (51%) vs. tumor (53%) was similar, in accord with the known prevalence of RAS mutations observed in mCRC patient populations. The positive agreement between plasma and tumor RAS results was 90.4% (47/52), the negative agreement was 93.5% (43/46), and the overall agreement (concordance) was 91.8% (90/98). The high concordance of plasma and tissue results demonstrates that blood-based RAS mutation testing is a viable alternative to tissue-based RAS testing.

Indexed as

Genes, rasMutationAgedColorectal NeoplasmsDNA, NeoplasmErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansMaleDNA, NeoplasmEGFR protein, humanErbB Receptorsanti-EGFR therapyCRCctDNAplasmaRAS mutations

Identifiers

PMID28106345
PMCPMC5527457
OpenAlexW2574977410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.