Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28105948›Full record

SynthesisBiomedical engineering online2016

Active lower limb prosthetics: a systematic review of design issues and solutions.

Michael Windrich, Martin Grimmer, Oliver Christ, Stephan Rinderknecht, Philipp Beckerle

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biomedical engineering online, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05818410 (Human-Prosthetic Interaction), which is not on this map. Cited by 76 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05818410 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Human-Prosthetic Interaction: Brain & Technology After Lower-Limb Loss

TypeinterventionalSponsorVrije Universiteit BrusselRan2024 to 2028Enrolled60ConditionsLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury)ArmsProsthetic device (Lunaris), No prosthetic device, Prosthetic device (Sach foot)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 267 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Therapeutic benefits of lower limb prostheses: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. EMG-driven control in lower limb prostheses: a topic-based systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Using EMG Biofeedback to Restore Closed-Loop Neural Control on a Powered Prosthetic Ankle.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Improving Device Testing Efficiency in Prosthetic Research: The Impact of an Automated Robustness Testing Protocol.Proceedings of the ... IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. ReliableFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Lower limb prosthetic prescription.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2023
    Review

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael WindrichMechanical Engineering, TU Darmstadt, 64289, Darmstadt, Germany. michael.windrich@gmx.de.
Martin GrimmerLauflabor Locomotion Laboratory, Institute of Sport Science, TU Darmstadt, Magdalenenstrasse 27, 64289, Darmstadt, Germany.
Oliver ChristSchool of Applied Psychology, Institute Humans in Complex Systems, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Riggenbachstrasse 16, 4600, Olten, Switzerland.
Stephan RinderknechtInstitute for Mechatronic Systems in Mechanical Engineering, TU Darmstadt, Otto-Berndt-Strasse 2, 64287, Darmstadt, Germany.
Philipp BeckerleInstitute for Mechatronic Systems in Mechanical Engineering, TU Darmstadt, Otto-Berndt-Strasse 2, 64287, Darmstadt, Germany.
Technical University of Darmstadt · DEFHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a review on design issues and solutions found in active lower limb prostheses. This review is based on a systematic literature search with a methodical search strategy. The search was carried out across four major technical databases and the retrieved records were screened for their relevance. A total of 21 different active prostheses, including 8 above-knee, 9 below-knee and 4 combined knee-ankle prostheses were identified. While an active prosthesis may help to restore the functional performance of an amputee, the requirements regarding the actuation unit as well as for the control system are high and the development becomes a challenging task. Regarding mechanical design and the actuation unit high force/torque delivery, high efficiency, low size and low weight are conflicting goals. The actuation principle and variable impedance actuators are discussed. The control system is paramount for a "natural functioning" of the prosthesis. The control system has to enable locomotion and should react to the amputee's intent. For this, multi-level control approaches are reviewed.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsKnee ProsthesisLower ExtremityAmputeesAnkleBiomechanical PhenomenaElectromyographyGaitHumansKnee JointProsthesis DesignTorqueActive prosthesisActuationArtificial limbControlDevelopmentPowered prosthesisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28105948
PMCPMC5249019
OpenAlexW2562207568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.