Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28105940›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2016

Integrated single cell data analysis reveals cell specific networks and novel coactivation markers.

Shila Ghazanfar, Adam J Bisogni, John T Ormerod, David M Lin, Jean Y H Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. From Noise to Knowledge: Diffusion Probabilistic Model-Based Neural Inference of Gene Regulatory Networks.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. scMerge leverages factor analysis, stable expression, and pseudoreplication to merge multiple single-cell RNA-seq datasets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shila GhazanfarSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Eastern Avenue, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia. shila.ghazanfar@sydney.edu.au.
Adam J BisogniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
John T OrmerodSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Eastern Avenue, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
David M LinDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Jean Y H YangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Eastern Avenue, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.

Funding

Research and Career Training in Vertebrate Developmental GenomicsT32HD057854 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI SCHIMENTI, JOHN C · 2010 to 2020
$1.3M
Protocadherins in vertebrate self recognitionR21DC015107 · NIDCD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI LIN, DAVID M. · 2017 to 2018
$412k
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD057854NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC015107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge scale single cell transcriptome profiling has exploded in recent years and has enabled unprecedented insight into the behavior of individual cells. Identifying genes with high levels of expression using data from single cell RNA sequencing can be useful to characterize very active genes and cells in which this occurs. In particular single cell RNA-Seq allows for cell-specific characterization of high gene expression, as well as gene coexpression.

resultsWe offer a versatile modeling framework to identify transcriptional states as well as structures of coactivation for different neuronal cell types across multiple datasets. We employed a gamma-normal mixture model to identify active gene expression across cells, and used these to characterize markers for olfactory sensory neuron cell maturity, and to build cell-specific coactivation networks. We found that combined analysis of multiple datasets results in more known maturity markers being identified, as well as pointing towards some novel genes that may be involved in neuronal maturation. We also observed that the cell-specific coactivation networks of mature neurons tended to have a higher centralization network measure than immature neurons.

conclusionIntegration of multiple datasets promises to bring about more statistical power to identify genes and patterns of interest. We found that transforming the data into active and inactive gene states allowed for more direct comparison of datasets, leading to identification of maturity marker genes and cell-specific network observations, taking into account the unique characteristics of single cell transcriptomics data.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptional ActivationComputational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksGenetic MarkersNeuronsOlfactory Receptor NeuronsGenetic MarkersMixture modellingNeuronOlfactory sensory neuronRNA-sequencingScRNA-SeqSingle-cell transcriptomics

Identifiers

PMID28105940
PMCPMC5249008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.