ArticleBMC systems biology2016
Integrated single cell data analysis reveals cell specific networks and novel coactivation markers.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved gene regulatory network inference from single cell data with dropout augmentation.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- From Noise to Knowledge: Diffusion Probabilistic Model-Based Neural Inference of Gene Regulatory Networks.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2024Article
- Inferring regulators of cell identity in the human adult pancreas.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Identification of Human Global, Tissue and Within-Tissue Cell-Specific Stably Expressed Genes at Single-Cell Resolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Ancient animal genome architecture reflects cell type identities.Nature ecology & evolution · 2019Article
- Evaluating stably expressed genes in single cells.GigaScience · 2019Article
- scMerge leverages factor analysis, stable expression, and pseudoreplication to merge multiple single-cell RNA-seq datasets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Network Medicine in the Age of Biomedical Big Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
- An integrative approach for building personalized gene regulatory networks for precision medicine.Genome medicine · 2018Review
- Article
- Evaluating methods of inferring gene regulatory networks highlights their lack of performance for single cell gene expression data.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- An accurate and robust imputation method scImpute for single-cell RNA-seq data.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Inferring gene regulatory networks from single-cell data: a mechanistic approach.BMC systems biology · 2017Article
- Bioinformatics and systems biology research update from the 15BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLarge scale single cell transcriptome profiling has exploded in recent years and has enabled unprecedented insight into the behavior of individual cells. Identifying genes with high levels of expression using data from single cell RNA sequencing can be useful to characterize very active genes and cells in which this occurs. In particular single cell RNA-Seq allows for cell-specific characterization of high gene expression, as well as gene coexpression.
resultsWe offer a versatile modeling framework to identify transcriptional states as well as structures of coactivation for different neuronal cell types across multiple datasets. We employed a gamma-normal mixture model to identify active gene expression across cells, and used these to characterize markers for olfactory sensory neuron cell maturity, and to build cell-specific coactivation networks. We found that combined analysis of multiple datasets results in more known maturity markers being identified, as well as pointing towards some novel genes that may be involved in neuronal maturation. We also observed that the cell-specific coactivation networks of mature neurons tended to have a higher centralization network measure than immature neurons.
conclusionIntegration of multiple datasets promises to bring about more statistical power to identify genes and patterns of interest. We found that transforming the data into active and inactive gene states allowed for more direct comparison of datasets, leading to identification of maturity marker genes and cell-specific network observations, taking into account the unique characteristics of single cell transcriptomics data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.