Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28105930›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2016

Genetic diversity among eight Dendrolimus species in Eurasia (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) inferred from mitochondrial COI and COII, and nuclear ITS2 markers.

Alexander Kononov, Kirill Ustyantsev, Baode Wang, Victor C Mastro, Victor Fet, Alexander Blinov, Yuri Baranchikov

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ontogenetic variability of the Siberian silk moth,Frontiers in insect science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pest categorisation ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pest categorisation ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Phylogeography ofEcology and evolution · 2019
    Article
  15. Commodity risk assessment of black pine (EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Pest categorisation ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2018
    Article
  18. The complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander KononovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science, 10 Prospekt Lavrentyeva, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia. kononov.nov@mail.ru.
Kirill UstyantsevInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science, 10 Prospekt Lavrentyeva, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Baode WangUSDA-APHIS-PPQ CPHST, Otis Laboratory, Building 1398, Otis Air National Guard Base, Buzzards Bay, MA, 02542, USA.
Victor C MastroUSDA-APHIS-PPQ CPHST, Otis Laboratory, Building 1398, Otis Air National Guard Base, Buzzards Bay, MA, 02542, USA.
Victor FetDepartment of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, 1601 5th Avenue, Huntington, WV, 25755, USA.
Alexander BlinovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science, 10 Prospekt Lavrentyeva, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Yuri BaranchikovV.N. Sukachev Institute of Forest, the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science, 50/28 Akademgorodok, Krasnoyarsk, 660036, Russia.
Institute of Cytology and Genetics · RUOtis (United States) · USMarshall University · USSukachev Institute of Forest · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMoths of genus Dendrolimus (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) are among the major pests of coniferous forests worldwide. Taxonomy and nomenclature of this genus are not entirely established, and there are many species with a controversial taxonomic position. We present a comparative evolutionary analysis of the most economically important Dendrolimus species in Eurasia.

resultsOur analysis was based on the nucleotide sequences of COI and COII mitochondrial genes and ITS2 spacer of nuclear ribosomal genes. All known sequences were extracted from GenBank. Additional 112 new sequences were identified for 28 specimens of D. sibiricus, D. pini, and D. superans from five regions of Siberia and the Russian Far East to be able to compare the disparate data from all previous studies. In total, 528 sequences were used in phylogenetic analysis. Two clusters of closely related species in Dendrolimus were found. The first cluster includes D. pini, D. sibiricus, and D. superans; and the second, D. spectabilis, D. punctatus, and D. tabulaeformis. Species D. houi and D. kikuchii appear to be the most basal in the genus.

conclusionGenetic difference among the second cluster species is very low in contrast to the first cluster species. Phylogenetic position D. tabulaeformis as a subspecies was supported. It was found that D. sibiricus recently separated from D. superans. Integration of D. sibiricus mitochondrial DNA sequences and the spread of this species to the west of Eurasia have been established as the cause of the unjustified allocation of a new species: D. kilmez. Our study further clarifies taxonomic problems in the genus and gives more complete information on the genetic structure of D. pini, D. sibiricus, and D. superans.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectron Transport Complex IVGenetic MarkersGenetic VariationInsect ProteinsMitochondriaMothsPhylogenyElectron Transport Complex IVGenetic MarkersInsect ProteinsDendrolimusDivergenceInterspecific hybridizationPestsPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID28105930
PMCPMC5249024
OpenAlexW2563416399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.