Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28105919›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016

SnoReport 2.0: new features and a refined Support Vector Machine to improve snoRNA identification.

João Victor de Araujo Oliveira, Fabrizio Costa, Rolf Backofen, Peter Florian Stadler, Maria Emília Machado Telles Walter, Jana Hertel

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The zebrafish (NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Stable lariats bearing a snoRNA (slb-snoRNA) in eukaryotic cells: A level of regulation for guide RNAs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The medium-size noncoding RNA transcriptome ofNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Small Non-Coding RNAome of Ageing Chondrocytes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Functional diversity of small nucleolar RNAs.Nucleic acids research · 2020
    Article
  19. Identification of DNA NEpigenetics & chromatin · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

João Victor de Araujo OliveiraDepartment of Computer Science, University of Brasilia, Brasília, BR-70910-900, Brazil. joaovicers@gmail.com.
Fabrizio CostaBioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Georges-Köhler-Allee 106, Freiburg, 79110, Germany.
Rolf BackofenBioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Georges-Köhler-Allee 106, Freiburg, 79110, Germany.
Peter Florian StadlerBioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, and Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics, University of Leipzig, Haertelstraße 16-18, Leipzig, D-04107, Germany.
Maria Emília Machado Telles WalterDepartment of Computer Science, University of Brasilia, Brasília, BR-70910-900, Brazil.
Jana HertelBioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, and Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics, University of Leipzig, Haertelstraße 16-18, Leipzig, D-04107, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundsnoReport uses RNA secondary structure prediction combined with machine learning as the basis to identify the two main classes of small nucleolar RNAs, the box H/ACA snoRNAs and the box C/D snoRNAs. Here, we present snoReport 2.0, which substantially improves and extends in the original method by: extracting new features for both box C/D and H/ACA box snoRNAs; developing a more sophisticated technique in the SVM training phase with recent data from vertebrate organisms and a careful choice of the SVM parameters C and γ; and using updated versions of tools and databases used for the construction of the original version of snoReport. To validate the new version and to demonstrate its improved performance, we tested snoReport 2.0 in different organisms.

resultsResults of the training and test phases of boxes H/ACA and C/D snoRNAs, in both versions of snoReport, are discussed. Validation on real data was performed to evaluate the predictions of snoReport 2.0. Our program was applied to a set of previously annotated sequences, some of them experimentally confirmed, of humans, nematodes, drosophilids, platypus, chickens and leishmania. We significantly improved the predictions for vertebrates, since the training phase used information of these organisms, but H/ACA box snoRNAs identification was improved for the other ones.

conclusionWe presented snoReport 2.0, to predict H/ACA box and C/D box snoRNAs, an efficient method to find true positives and avoid false positives in vertebrate organisms. H/ACA box snoRNA classifier showed an F-score of 93 % (an improvement of 10 % regarding the previous version), while C/D box snoRNA classifier, an F-Score of 94 % (improvement of 14 %). Besides, both classifiers exhibited performance measures above 90 %. These results show that snoReport 2.0 avoid false positives and false negatives, allowing to predict snoRNAs with high quality. In the validation phase, snoReport 2.0 predicted 67.43 % of vertebrate organisms for both classes. For Nematodes and Drosophilids, 69 % and 76.67 %, for H/ACA box snoRNAs were predicted, respectively, showing that snoReport 2.0 is good to identify snoRNAs in vertebrates and also H/ACA box snoRNAs in invertebrates organisms.

Indexed as

Support Vector MachineAnimalsBase SequenceComputational BiologyEukaryotaHumansMolecular Sequence DataRNA, Small NucleolarVertebratesRNA, Small NucleolarC/D box snoRNAH/ACA box snoRNAMachine learningNon-coding RNAsnoRNASupport Vector Machine (SVM)

Identifiers

PMID28105919
PMCPMC5249026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.