ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016
SnoReport 2.0: new features and a refined Support Vector Machine to improve snoRNA identification.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Analysis of Telomerase RNA Evolution inNon-coding RNA · 2026Article
- Computational limitations and future needs to unravel the full potential of 2'-O-methylation and C/D box snoRNAs.RNA biology · 2025Review
- Small nucleolar RNA dysregulation and potential roles in bovine subclinical mastitis.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2025Article
- SnoBIRD: a tool to identify C/D box snoRNAs and refine their annotation across all eukaryotes.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- The zebrafish (NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- CRISPR-Cas13d screens identify KILR, a breast cancer risk-associated lncRNA that regulates DNA replication and repair.Molecular cancer · 2024Article
- Comprehensive map of ribosomal 2'-O-methylation and C/D box snoRNAs in Drosophila melanogaster.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Marine gregarine genomes reveal the breadth of apicomplexan diversity with a partially conserved glideosome machinery.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Small and intermediate size structural RNAs in the unicellular parasiteMicrobial genomics · 2022Article
- Stable lariats bearing a snoRNA (slb-snoRNA) in eukaryotic cells: A level of regulation for guide RNAs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Systematic Identification and Functional Validation of New snoRNAs in Human Muscle Progenitors.Non-coding RNA · 2021Article
- Insertions of codons encoding basic amino acids in H7 hemagglutinins of influenza A viruses occur by recombination with RNA at hotspots near snoRNA binding sites.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- Conservation of Archaeal C/D Box sRNA-Guided RNA Modifications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- The medium-size noncoding RNA transcriptome ofNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Genome-Wide Screening and Characterization of Non-Coding RNAs inNon-coding RNA · 2020Article
- Small Non-Coding RNAome of Ageing Chondrocytes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Small nucleolar RNAs: continuing identification of novel members and increasing diversity of their molecular mechanisms of action.Biochemical Society transactions · 2020Review
- Functional diversity of small nucleolar RNAs.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Identification of DNA NEpigenetics & chromatin · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundsnoReport uses RNA secondary structure prediction combined with machine learning as the basis to identify the two main classes of small nucleolar RNAs, the box H/ACA snoRNAs and the box C/D snoRNAs. Here, we present snoReport 2.0, which substantially improves and extends in the original method by: extracting new features for both box C/D and H/ACA box snoRNAs; developing a more sophisticated technique in the SVM training phase with recent data from vertebrate organisms and a careful choice of the SVM parameters C and γ; and using updated versions of tools and databases used for the construction of the original version of snoReport. To validate the new version and to demonstrate its improved performance, we tested snoReport 2.0 in different organisms.
resultsResults of the training and test phases of boxes H/ACA and C/D snoRNAs, in both versions of snoReport, are discussed. Validation on real data was performed to evaluate the predictions of snoReport 2.0. Our program was applied to a set of previously annotated sequences, some of them experimentally confirmed, of humans, nematodes, drosophilids, platypus, chickens and leishmania. We significantly improved the predictions for vertebrates, since the training phase used information of these organisms, but H/ACA box snoRNAs identification was improved for the other ones.
conclusionWe presented snoReport 2.0, to predict H/ACA box and C/D box snoRNAs, an efficient method to find true positives and avoid false positives in vertebrate organisms. H/ACA box snoRNA classifier showed an F-score of 93 % (an improvement of 10 % regarding the previous version), while C/D box snoRNA classifier, an F-Score of 94 % (improvement of 14 %). Besides, both classifiers exhibited performance measures above 90 %. These results show that snoReport 2.0 avoid false positives and false negatives, allowing to predict snoRNAs with high quality. In the validation phase, snoReport 2.0 predicted 67.43 % of vertebrate organisms for both classes. For Nematodes and Drosophilids, 69 % and 76.67 %, for H/ACA box snoRNAs were predicted, respectively, showing that snoReport 2.0 is good to identify snoRNAs in vertebrates and also H/ACA box snoRNAs in invertebrates organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.