Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28105912›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016

DGW: an exploratory data analysis tool for clustering and visualisation of epigenomic marks.

Saulius Lukauskas, Roberto Visintainer, Guido Sanguinetti, Gabriele B Schweikert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saulius LukauskasDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. saulius.lukauskas13@imperial.ac.uk.
Roberto VisintainerFondazione Bruno Kessler, Via Sommarive 18, Povo, I-38123, TN, Italy.
Guido SanguinettiSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, 10 Crichton St, Edinburgh, EH8 9AB, Scotland.
Gabriele B SchweikertSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, 10 Crichton St, Edinburgh, EH8 9AB, Scotland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFunctional genomic and epigenomic research relies fundamentally on sequencing based methods like ChIP-seq for the detection of DNA-protein interactions. These techniques return large, high dimensional data sets with visually complex structures, such as multi-modal peaks extended over large genomic regions. Current tools for visualisation and data exploration represent and leverage these complex features only to a limited extent.

resultsWe present DGW, an open source software package for simultaneous alignment and clustering of multiple epigenomic marks. DGW uses Dynamic Time Warping to adaptively rescale and align genomic distances which allows to group regions of interest with similar shapes, thereby capturing the structure of epigenomic marks. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach in a simulation study and on a real epigenomic data set from the ENCODE project.

conclusionsOur results show that DGW automatically recognises and aligns important genomic features such as transcription start sites and splicing sites from histone marks. DGW is available as an open source Python package.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationGenome, HumanHistone CodeSoftwareChromatin ImmunoprecipitationCluster AnalysisDNADNA-Binding ProteinsEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsHumansLeukemiaDNADNA-Binding ProteinsChIP-seqClusteringDynamic Time WarpingEpigenetics

Identifiers

PMID28105912
PMCPMC5249015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.