Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28105573›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2017

Effect of Movement Velocity During Resistance Training on Dynamic Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Timothy B Davies, Kenny Kuang, Rhonda Orr, Mark Halaki, Daniel Hackett

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04845295 (The Effects of Resistance Training on Skeletal Muscle Morphological, Mechanical and Contractile Properties), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 15 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04845295 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of Resistance Training on Skeletal Muscle Morphological, Mechanical and Contractile Properties

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BelgradeRan2019 to 2019Enrolled24ConditionsHypertrophy, ContractionArmsresistance training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Timothy B DaviesUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kenny KuangUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Rhonda OrrUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mark HalakiUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Daniel HackettUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. daniel.hackett@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2504-3942

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMovement velocity is an acute resistance-training variable that can be manipulated to potentially optimize dynamic muscular strength development. However, it is unclear whether performing faster or slower repetitions actually influences dynamic muscular strength gains.

objectiveWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effect of movement velocity during resistance training on dynamic muscular strength.

methodsFive electronic databases were searched using terms related to movement velocity and resistance training. Studies were deemed eligible for inclusion if they met the following criteria: randomized and non-randomized comparative studies; published in English; included healthy adults; used isotonic resistance-exercise interventions directly comparing fast or explosive training to slower movement velocity training; matched in prescribed intensity and volume; duration ≥4 weeks; and measured dynamic muscular strength changes.

resultsA total of 15 studies were identified that investigated movement velocity in accordance with the criteria outlined. Fast and moderate-slow resistance training were found to produce similar increases in dynamic muscular strength when all studies were included. However, when intensity was accounted for, there was a trend for a small effect favoring fast compared with moderate-slow training when moderate intensities, defined as 60-79% one repetition maximum, were used (effect size 0.31; p = 0.06). Strength gains between conditions were not influenced by training status and age.

conclusionsOverall, the results suggest that fast and moderate-slow resistance training improve dynamic muscular strength similarly in individuals within a wide range of training statuses and ages. Resistance training performed at fast movement velocities using moderate intensities showed a trend for superior muscular strength gains as compared to moderate-slow resistance training. Both training practices should be considered for novice to advanced, young and older resistance trainers targeting dynamic muscular strength.

Indexed as

Muscle StrengthHumansMuscle, SkeletalResistance Training

Identifiers

PMID28105573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.