ArticleIsrael journal of health policy research2017
The right to know one's genetic origins and cross-border medically assisted reproduction.
Article in Israel journal of health policy research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioethics Across Borders : Mapping Key Cases and Exploring the Ethical Implications of Patient and Healthcare Staff Mobility Between Germany and Poland.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2026Article
- Integrating Genetic Information into the Electronic Health Record: The Case of Adolescents' Revelation of Misattributed Parentage.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2026Article
- University students' opinion on gamete donor identification regimes.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Observational
- From collected stamps to hair locks: ethical and legal implications of testing DNA found on privately owned family artifacts.Human genetics · 2023Article
- The Pandora's box of transparency opened by direct-to-consumer genetic testing.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
- Good practice recommendations for information provision for those involved in reproductive donationHuman reproduction open · 2022Article
- Motivations and Attitudes of Men Towards Sperm Donation: Whom to Donate and Why?Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP · 2022Article
- Post-mortem Reproduction from a Vietnamese Perspective-an Analysis and Commentary.Asian bioethics review · 2020Article
- Regulatory responses to assisted reproductive technology: a comparative analysis of Spain and Israel.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of donor sperm or egg for reproduction raises the issue of the right of donor-conceived individuals to know their genetic origins. This paper argues in favor of acknowledging such a right and explores the challenges that cross-border medically assisted reproduction would raise in relation to it. It first explores possible justifications for such a right by discerning its possible conceptual and empirical groundings. It describes some key ethical and policy implications of the removal of donor anonymity. It then argues that novel technologies such as mitochondrial replacement and gene editing raise new concerns in this area and may expand the scope of such a right. Finally, it argues that while many barriers to accessing information about genetic origins already exist at national levels, cross-border medically assisted reproduction may exacerbate a reality in which many individuals conceived through third-party participation are deprived of information that may be crucial to their future well-being for medical or psycho-social reasons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.