ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2016
Effect of anti-VEGF drugs combined with photodynamic therapy in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- No-Dose Photodynamic Therapy Against Half-Dose Photodynamic Therapy for Treatment of Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- Half-Fluence, Half-Dose Photodynamic Therapy: Less Direct Damage but More Inflammation?Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparative efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor regimens for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2020Article
- Impact of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism on the efficacy of photodynamic therapy in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We analyzed the effects of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs combined with photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Ninety-six cases (192 eyes) of AMD were included in this study and randomly divided into the observation group and control group (n=48 cases per group). The control group was administered the treatment of Lucentis intravitreal injection alone and the observation group was administered Lucentis combined with PDT. The therapeutic effects were compared. The best corrected visual acuity of patients in the two groups increased gradually after treatment. Patients in the observation group had a significantly higher visual acuity when compared to the control group 1 and 6 months post-operation. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The proportion of patients with vision improvement in the observation group was higher than that in the control group from 1 to 6 months; differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Through detection by color Doppler ultrasound within 6 months after treatment, we observed that the peak systolic velocity and arterial end diastolic velocity of retrobulbar optic nerve bitemporal PCA of the observation group were higher than those of the control group. The values of arterial resistance index and pulsatility index of the observation group were lower than those of control group. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Six months after treatment, the value of central foveal thickness of the observation group was lower than that of the control group, the value of mean sensitivity of visual field parameter 10° and 4° was higher in the observation group than in the control group, and the absolute value of mean defects in the observation group were lower than that of the control group. In summary, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Anti-VEGF drugs combined with PDT can optimize the overall vision of patients with AMD, improve hemodynamic parameters and reduce visual field defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.