ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2017
Interrogating open issues in cancer precision medicine with patient-derived xenografts.
Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 418 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
418 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 657 citations in OpenAlex.
- Building bridges to immunotherapy: a knowledge-mapping analysis of cervical cancer organoid research.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Results of the Phase I/II Study and Preliminary B-cell Gene Signature of Combined Inhibition of Glutamine Metabolism and EGFR in Colorectal Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Trial
- Clinical utility of PDX cohorts to reveal biomarkers of intrinsic resistance and clonal architecture changes underlying acquired resistance to cetuximab in HNSCC.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022Trial
- Fc-Dependent Targeting of the GAS6-MERTK Axis With Monoclonal and Bispecific Antibodies Overcomes Drug Resistance Across EGFR Mutations in Exons 19, 20, and 21.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- A Living Multi-Omics PDX Biobank of High-Risk Sarcomas Reveals ecDNA-Driven Oncogene Amplification in Osteosarcoma and Enables Preclinical Precision Oncology.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- The molecular similarity landscape of preclinical cancer models to patient tumors.JCI insight · 2026Article
- Deciphering the Functional Mechanisms of eIF3f in Tumors and Exploring Targeted Therapies.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Review
- Bioengineering advances in pancreatic cancer organoids for reproducible tumor microenvironment modeling.iScience · 2026Review
- Review
- Zebrafish swimming towards cures: a scalable NAM platform for drug discovery.Drug discovery today · 2026Review
- Tumor microenvironment-specific nanomedicine: from biology-driven to multi-omics-guided precision engineering.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Deconstructing cancer in 3D: models, mechanisms, and personalized solutions.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Organoids in cancer therapy: translational applications and clinical promise.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Patient-Derived Models of Liver Cancer to Inform Clinical Treatment Paradigms: Recent Updates.Seminars in liver disease · 2026Review
- Harnessing PDX and PDX 2.0: the next-generation paradigm for precision oncology and translational breakthroughs.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- The Molecular and Functional Landscape of Resistance to FOLFIRI Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Cancer discovery · 2026Article
- Establishment of a Large-Scale PDX Library of Head and Neck Cancers for Functional Precision Oncology.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Introduction to animal modelling: factors and tools for choosing the optimal model for sarcoma research-a comprehensive literature review.Translational cancer research · 2026Review
358 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
42 authors at 20 institutions in 11 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) have emerged as an important platform to elucidate new treatments and biomarkers in oncology. PDX models are used to address clinically relevant questions, including the contribution of tumour heterogeneity to therapeutic responsiveness, the patterns of cancer evolutionary dynamics during tumour progression and under drug pressure, and the mechanisms of resistance to treatment. The ability of PDX models to predict clinical outcomes is being improved through mouse humanization strategies and the implementation of co-clinical trials, within which patients and PDXs reciprocally inform therapeutic decisions. This Opinion article discusses aspects of PDX modelling that are relevant to these questions and highlights the merits of shared PDX resources to advance cancer medicine from the perspective of EurOPDX, an international initiative devoted to PDX-based research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.