ArticleBMJ open2017
Māori patients' experiences and perspectives of chronic kidney disease: a New Zealand qualitative interview study.
Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perspectives of Indigenous Peoples on Home Dialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026Pooled it
- The co-creation of eating and wellbeing guidelines with rangatahi (young people) in Aotearoa New Zealand.Public health nutrition · 2026Guideline
- Pooled it
- Patient engagement during the transition from nondialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease to dialysis: A meta-ethnography.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Reported sources of health inequities in Indigenous Peoples with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of quantitative studies.BMC public health · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Reported Māori consumer experiences of health systems and programs in qualitative research: a systematic review with meta-synthesis.International journal for equity in health · 2019Pooled it
- Work of being an adult patient with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of qualitative studies.BMJ open · 2018Pooled it
- Patients' transition experience and care from predialysis to dialysis: a theory-guided integrative review.BMC nephrology · 2025Review
- A Qualitative Study of Aboriginal Peoples' Health Care Experiences With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Qualitative health research · 2025Article
- Dealing with an uncertain future: a survey study on what patients with chronic kidney disease actually want to know.Clinical kidney journal · 2024Article
- Occupational Performance Coaching for Children With Neurodisability: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2024Article
- Structural and Psychosocial Challenges Among Underserved Patients Receiving Hemodialysis During and Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.Kidney medicine · 2023Article
- Patient Preferences for the Management of Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Kidney Transplantation: a Discrete Choice Experiment.Kidney international reports · 2023Article
- Assessment of a Peer Support Group Intervention for Undocumented Latinx Immigrants With Kidney Failure.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Stigma and related factors among renal dialysis patients in China.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Article
- A qualitative study on shared decision-making of patients with chronic kidney disease.Nursing open · 2021Article
- Experiences of New Zealand Haemodialysis Patients in Relation to Food and Nutrition Management: A Qualitative Study.Nutrients · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore and describe Māori (the indigenous people of New Zealand) patients' experiences and perspectives of chronic kidney disease (CKD), as these are largely unknown for indigenous groups with CKD.
designFace-to-face, semistructured interviews with purposive sampling and thematic analysis.
setting3 dialysis centres in New Zealand (NZ), all of which offered all forms of dialysis modalities.
participants13 Māori patients with CKD and who were either nearing the need for dialysis or had started dialysis within the previous 12 months.
resultsThe Māori concepts of whakamā (disempowerment and embarrassment) and whakamana (sense of self-esteem and self-determination) provided an overarching framework for interpreting the themes identified: disempowered by delayed CKD diagnosis (resentment of late diagnosis; missed opportunities for preventive care; regret and self-blame); confronting the stigma of kidney disease (multigenerational trepidation; shame and embarrassment; fear and denial); developing and sustaining relationships to support treatment decision-making (importance of family/whānau; valuing peer support; building clinician-patient trust); and maintaining cultural identity (spiritual connection to land; and upholding inner strength/mana).
conclusionsMāori patients with CKD experienced marginalisation within the NZ healthcare system due to delayed diagnosis, a focus on individuals rather than family, multigenerational fear of dialysis, and an awareness that clinicians are not aware of cultural considerations and values during decision-making. Prompt diagnosis to facilitate self-management and foster trust between patients and clinicians, involvement of family and peers in dialysis care, and acknowledging patient values could strengthen patient engagement and align decision-making with patient priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.