Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28104643›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2017

Reduced Patient Radiation Exposure during Neurodiagnostic and Interventional X-Ray Angiography with a New Imaging Platform.

K van der Marel, S Vedantham, I M J van der Bom, M Howk, T Narain, K Ty, A Karellas, M J Gounis, A S Puri, A K Wakhloo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Feasibility of ultra-low radiation dose digital subtraction angiography: Preliminary study in a simplified cerebral angiography phantom.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

K van der MarelFrom the Department of Radiology (K.v.d.M., S.V., M.H., T.N., K.T., A.K., M.J.G., A.S.P., A.K.W.), New England Center for Stroke Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-1099-9498
S VedanthamFrom the Department of Radiology (K.v.d.M., S.V., M.H., T.N., K.T., A.K., M.J.G., A.S.P., A.K.W.), New England Center for Stroke Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-4123-8392
I M J van der BomPhilips Healthcare (I.M.J.v.d.B.), Best, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3576-3062
M HowkFrom the Department of Radiology (K.v.d.M., S.V., M.H., T.N., K.T., A.K., M.J.G., A.S.P., A.K.W.), New England Center for Stroke Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-0390-4251
T NarainFrom the Department of Radiology (K.v.d.M., S.V., M.H., T.N., K.T., A.K., M.J.G., A.S.P., A.K.W.), New England Center for Stroke Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-2328-9639
K TyFrom the Department of Radiology (K.v.d.M., S.V., M.H., T.N., K.T., A.K., M.J.G., A.S.P., A.K.W.), New England Center for Stroke Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-5753-6744
A KarellasFrom the Department of Radiology (K.v.d.M., S.V., M.H., T.N., K.T., A.K., M.J.G., A.S.P., A.K.W.), New England Center for Stroke Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-5877-3677
M J GounisFrom the Department of Radiology (K.v.d.M., S.V., M.H., T.N., K.T., A.K., M.J.G., A.S.P., A.K.W.), New England Center for Stroke Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts Matthew.Gounis@umassmed.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8034-2785
A S PuriFrom the Department of Radiology (K.v.d.M., S.V., M.H., T.N., K.T., A.K., M.J.G., A.S.P., A.K.W.), New England Center for Stroke Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-6978-6457
A K WakhlooFrom the Department of Radiology (K.v.d.M., S.V., M.H., T.N., K.T., A.K., M.J.G., A.S.P., A.K.W.), New England Center for Stroke Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-2126-4155
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USPhilips (Finland) · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeAdvancements in medical device and imaging technology as well as accruing clinical evidence have accelerated the growth of the endovascular treatment of cerebrovascular diseases. However, the augmented role of these procedures raises concerns about the radiation dose to patients and operators. We evaluated patient doses from an x-ray imaging platform with radiation dose-reduction technology, which combined image noise reduction, motion correction, and contrast-dependent temporal averaging with optimized x-ray exposure settings. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this single-center, retrospective study, cumulative dose-area product inclusive of fluoroscopy, angiography, and 3D acquisitions for all neurovascular procedures performed during a 2-year period on the dose-reduction platform were compared with a reference platform. Key study features were the following: The neurointerventional radiologist could select the targeted dose reduction for each patient with the dose-reduction platform, and the statistical analyses included patient characteristics and the neurointerventional radiologist as covariates. The analyzed outcome measures were cumulative dose (kerma)-area product, fluoroscopy duration, and administered contrast volume.

resultsA total of 1238 neurointerventional cases were included, of which 914 and 324 were performed on the reference and dose-reduction platforms, respectively. Over all diagnostic and neurointerventional procedures, the cumulative dose-area product was significantly reduced by 53.2% (mean reduction, 160.3 Gy × cm

conclusionsA significant reduction in patient radiation dose is achievable during neurovascular procedures by using dose-reduction technology with a minimal impact on workflow.

Indexed as

AgedAngiography, Digital SubtractionCerebral AngiographyCerebrovascular DisordersEndovascular ProceduresFemaleFluoroscopyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiation DosageRadiation ExposureRadiography, InterventionalRetrospective StudiesX-Rays

Identifiers

PMID28104643
PMCPMC7959998
OpenAlexW2577305319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.