Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28104245›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2017

Assessing kinematics and kinetics of functional electrical stimulation rowing.

Adina E Draghici, Glen Picard, J Andrew Taylor, Sandra J Shefelbine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Functional electrical stimulation (FES)-assisted rowing combined with zoledronic acid, but not alone, preserves distal femur strength and stiffness in people with chronic spinal cord injury.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adina E DraghiciDepartment of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: draghici.a@husky.neu.edu.
Glen PicardCardiovascular Research Laboratory, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
J Andrew TaylorCardiovascular Research Laboratory, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sandra J ShefelbineDepartment of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Hybrid-FES Exercise To Prevent Cardiovascular Declines In Acute Spinal Cord InjuryR01HL117037 · NHLBI · SPAULDING REHABILITATION HOSPITAL · PI TAYLOR, J ANDREW · 2013 to 2024
$4.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL117037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybrid functional electrical stimulation (FES) rowing has positive effects on cardiovascular fitness, producing significantly greater aerobic power than either upper body or FES exercise alone. However, there is minimal information on the kinematics, kinetics, and mechanical efficiency of FES-rowing in the spinal cord injured (SCI) population. This study examined the biomechanics of FES-rowing to determine how motions, forces, and aerobic demand change with increasing intensity. Six individuals with SCI and six able-bodied subjects performed a progressive aerobic capacity rowing test. Differences in kinematics (motion profiles), kinetics (forces produced by the feet and arms), external mechanical work, and mechanical efficiency (work produced/volume of oxygen consumed) were compared in able-bodied rowing vs. SCI FES-rowing at three comparable subpeak workloads. With increasing exercise intensity (measured as wattage), able-bodied rowing increased stroke rate by decreasing recovery time, while FES-rowing maintained a constant stroke rate, with no change in drive or recovery times. While able-bodied rowers increased leg and arm forces with increasing intensity, FES-rowers used only their arms to achieve a higher intensity with a constant and relatively low contribution of the legs. Oxygen consumption increased in both groups, but more so in able-bodied rowers, resulting in able-bodied rowers having twice the mechanical efficiency of FES-rowers. Our results suggest that despite its ability to allow for whole body exercise, the total force output achievable with FES-rowing results in only modest loading of the legs that affects overall rowing performance and that may limit forces applied to bone.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyMechanical PhenomenaAdultArmBiomechanical PhenomenaElectric Stimulation TherapyFemaleHumansKineticsMaleOxygen ConsumptionSpinal Cord InjuriesAerobic workFES-rowingKinematicsKineticsMechanical efficiency

Identifiers

PMID28104245
PMCPMC5340620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.