ArticleBMC research notes2017
Differential correlation for sequencing data.
Article in BMC research notes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Introduction to Network Analysis in Plant Biology.Plant direct · 2025Article
- Correlation and causation for cardiothoracic surgeons: part 4-distinguishing relationships in data.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025Article
- The long-term straw return resulted in significant differences in soil microbial community composition and community assembly processes between wheat and rice.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Untargeted Metabolomics Reveals Dysregulation of Glycine- and Serine-Coupled Metabolic Pathways in an ALDH1L1-Dependent Manner In Vivo.Metabolites · 2024Article
- The transcriptional regulatory network modulating human trophoblast stem cells to extravillous trophoblast differentiation.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Correlations for untargeted GC × GC-HRTOF-MS metabolomics of colorectal cancer.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2023Article
- SeqNet: An R Package for Generating Gene-Gene Networks and Simulating RNA-Seq Data.Journal of statistical software · 2021Article
- Article
- Comparing Statistical Tests for Differential Network Analysis of Gene Modules.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Characterizing Genetic Regulatory Elements in Ovine Tissues.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Hippocampal Subregion Transcriptomic Profiles Reflect Strategy Selection during Cognitive Aging.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Classification of Cancer Types Using Graph Convolutional Neural Networks.Frontiers in physics · 2020Article
- MuscNet, a Weighted Voting Model of Multi-Source Connectivity Networks to Predict Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Resting-State Functional MRI.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2020Article
- Differential co-expression-based detection of conditional relationships in transcriptional data: comparative analysis and application to breast cancer.Genome biology · 2019Article
- New Statistical Methods for Constructing Robust Differential Correlation Networks to characterize the interactions among microRNAs.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Laser Capture Microdissection and RNA-Seq Analysis: High Sensitivity Approaches to Explain Histopathological Heterogeneity in Human Glioblastoma FFPE Archived Tissues.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSeveral methods have been developed to identify differential correlation (DC) between pairs of molecular features from -omics studies. Most DC methods have only been tested with microarrays and other platforms producing continuous and Gaussian-like data. Sequencing data is in the form of counts, often modeled with a negative binomial distribution making it difficult to apply standard correlation metrics. We have developed an R package for identifying DC called Discordant which uses mixture models for correlations between features and the Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm for fitting parameters of the mixture model. Several correlation metrics for sequencing data are provided and tested using simulations. Other extensions in the Discordant package include additional modeling for different types of differential correlation, and faster implementation, using a subsampling routine to reduce run-time and address the assumption of independence between molecular feature pairs.
resultsWith simulations and breast cancer miRNA-Seq and RNA-Seq data, we find that Spearman's correlation has the best performance among the tested correlation methods for identifying differential correlation. Application of Spearman's correlation in the Discordant method demonstrated the most power in ROC curves and sensitivity/specificity plots, and improved ability to identify experimentally validated breast cancer miRNA. We also considered including additional types of differential correlation, which showed a slight reduction in power due to the additional parameters that need to be estimated, but more versatility in applications. Finally, subsampling within the EM algorithm considerably decreased run-time with negligible effect on performance.
conclusionsA new method and R package called Discordant is presented for identifying differential correlation with sequencing data. Based on comparisons with different correlation metrics, this study suggests Spearman's correlation is appropriate for sequencing data, but other correlation metrics are available to the user depending on the application and data type. The Discordant method can also be extended to investigate additional DC types and subsampling with the EM algorithm is now available for reduced run-time. These extensions to the R package make Discordant more robust and versatile for multiple -omics studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.