Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28103946›Full record

ArticleJournal of hematology & oncology2017

EPCR promotes breast cancer progression by altering SPOCK1/testican 1-mediated 3D growth.

Naiara Perurena, Carolina Zandueta, Susana Martínez-Canarias, Haritz Moreno, Silvestre Vicent, Ana S Almeida, Elisabet Guruceaga, Roger R Gomis, Marta Santisteban, Mikala Egeblad and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Multiomic analysis of the function ofThe Journal of international medical research · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Proteoglycans as Mediators of Cancer Tissue Mechanics.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Naiara PerurenaAdhesion and Metastasis Laboratory, Program Solid Tumors and Biomarkers, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Carolina ZanduetaAdhesion and Metastasis Laboratory, Program Solid Tumors and Biomarkers, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Susana Martínez-CanariasAdhesion and Metastasis Laboratory, Program Solid Tumors and Biomarkers, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Haritz MorenoAdhesion and Metastasis Laboratory, Program Solid Tumors and Biomarkers, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Silvestre VicentAdhesion and Metastasis Laboratory, Program Solid Tumors and Biomarkers, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Ana S AlmeidaCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Elisabet GuruceagaProteomics, Genomics and Bioinformatics Core Facility, Pamplona, Spain.
Roger R GomisOncology Program, Institute for Research in Biomedicine, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta SantistebanDepartment of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Mikala EgebladCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
José HermidaCardiovascular Sciences Program, Center for Applied Medical Research, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Fernando LecandaAdhesion and Metastasis Laboratory, Program Solid Tumors and Biomarkers, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, 31008, Pamplona, Spain. flecanda@unav.es.
Universidad de Navarra · ESCold Spring Harbor Laboratory · USClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESInstitute for Research in Biomedicine · ES

Funding

Single-Cell Biology Shared ResourceP30CA045508 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI John Edward Moses · 1987 to 2026
$118.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA045508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundActivated protein C/endothelial protein C receptor (APC/EPCR) axis is physiologically involved in anticoagulant and cytoprotective activities in endothelial cells. Emerging evidence indicates that EPCR also plays a role in breast stemness and human tumorigenesis. Yet, its contribution to breast cancer progression and metastasis has not been elucidated.

methodsTranscriptomic status of EPCR was examined in a cohort of 286 breast cancer patients. Cell growth kinetics was evaluated in control and EPCR and SPARC/osteonectin, Cwcv, and kazal-like domains proteoglycan (SPOCK1/testican 1) silenced breast cancer cells in 2D, 3D, and in co-culture conditions. Orthotopic tumor growth and lung and osseous metastases were evaluated in several human and murine xenograft breast cancer models. Tumor-stroma interactions were further studied in vivo by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. An EPCR-induced gene signature was identified by microarray analysis.

resultsAnalysis of a cohort of breast cancer patients revealed an association of high EPCR levels with adverse clinical outcome. Interestingly, EPCR knockdown did not affect cell growth kinetics in 2D but significantly reduced cell growth in 3D cultures. Using several human and murine xenograft breast cancer models, we showed that EPCR silencing reduced primary tumor growth and secondary outgrowths at metastatic sites, including the skeleton and the lungs. Interestingly, these effects were independent of APC ligand stimulation in vitro and in vivo. Transcriptomic analysis of EPCR-silenced tumors unveiled an effect mediated by matricellular secreted proteoglycan SPOCK1/testican 1. Interestingly, SPOCK1 silencing suppressed in vitro 3D growth. Moreover, SPOCK1 ablation severely decreased orthotopic tumor growth and reduced bone metastatic osteolytic tumors. High SPOCK1 levels were also associated with poor clinical outcome in a subset breast cancer patients. Our results suggest that EPCR through SPOCK1 confers a cell growth advantage in 3D promoting breast tumorigenesis and metastasis.

conclusionsEPCR represents a clinically relevant factor associated with poor outcome and a novel vulnerability to develop combination therapies for breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinomaCell Culture TechniquesCell CycleCell DivisionCell Line, TumorCoculture TechniquesDisease ProgressionEndothelial Protein C ReceptorFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHeterograftsHumansLung NeoplasmsEndothelial Protein C ReceptorNeoplasm ProteinsPROCR protein, humanProteoglycansSPOCK1 protein, humanExtracellular matrixMatricellularMetastasisMicroenvironmentSphere cultures

Identifiers

PMID28103946
PMCPMC5248526
OpenAlexW2575397206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.