Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28103852›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2017

Stiffness of the locking compression plate as an external fixator for treating distal tibial fractures: a biomechanics study.

Wei Liu, Lihui Yang, Xiaochuan Kong, Likun An, Gang Hong, Zicheng Guo, Lei Zang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. An engineering review of external fixators.Medical engineering & physics · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wei LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Lihui YangDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Xiaochuan KongDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Likun AnDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Gang HongDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Zicheng GuoDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Lei ZangDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China. canglei@263.net.
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing Chao-Yang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocking compress plate, as external fixator, is an attractive technique for distal tibial fracture treatment. But it still remains unclear whether the external LCP has sufficient stiffness. Thus, the present study aims to make a comprehensive evaluation of the stiffness of external locking compress plate when it is used as an external fixator in distal tibial fractures treatment.

methodsComposite tibia was used to simulate distal tibia fracture (Orthopedic Trauma Association type 43 A3 fracture). The fractures were stabilized with medial distal tibial locking compress plates (LCP group), medial distal tibial locking compress plates with 30-mm plate-bone distances (EF-tibia group), and medial distal femur locking compress plates with 30-mm plate-bone distances (EF-femur group). Stiffness of each configuration was measured under axial compression loading and in axial torsion loading directions. Compression stiffness and torsional rigidity were compared across different groups.

resultsCompared with LCP group, (1) EF-tibia group showed significantly lower (p < 0.001) compression stiffness and torsional rigidity; (2) EF-femur group showed significantly lower (p < 0.001) compression stiffness, but significantly higher (p < 0.001) torsional rigidity.

conclusionsThe results indicated that locking compress plate as an external fixator was flexible, and the distal femur locking compress plate was preferred over the distal tibial locking compress plate to be an external fixator in distal tibia fracture treatment.

Indexed as

Bone PlatesBiomechanical PhenomenaCompressive StrengthEquipment DesignExternal FixatorsFemurFracture FixationHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMaterials TestingPliabilityTibiaTibial FracturesWeight-BearingBiomechanicsExternal fixationFractureLocking compression plateTibia

Identifiers

PMID28103852
PMCPMC5248451
OpenAlexW2575037922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.