Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28103843›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

Sedentary behavior among Spanish children and adolescents: findings from the ANIBES study.

Juan Mielgo-Ayuso, Raquel Aparicio-Ugarriza, Adrian Castillo, Emma Ruiz, Jose M Avila, Javier Aranceta-Bartrina, Angel Gil, Rosa M Ortega, Lluis Serra-Majem, Gregorio Varela-Moreiras and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Parental Self-Efficacy to Promote Children's Healthy Lifestyles: A Pilot and Feasibility Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Maternal Education Level and Excessive Recreational Screen Time in Children: A Mediation Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Understanding differences between summer vs. school obesogenic behaviors of children: the structured days hypothesis.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Juan Mielgo-AyusoImFINE Research Group, Department of Health and Human Performance, Technical University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Raquel Aparicio-UgarrizaImFINE Research Group, Department of Health and Human Performance, Technical University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Adrian CastilloSpanish Nutrition Foundation (FEN), Madrid, Spain.
Emma RuizSpanish Nutrition Foundation (FEN), Madrid, Spain.
Jose M AvilaSpanish Nutrition Foundation (FEN), Madrid, Spain.
Javier Aranceta-BartrinaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Angel GilCIBER: CB12/03/30038 Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y la Nutrición, CIBERobn, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain.
Rosa M OrtegaDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmacy, Complutense University Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Lluis Serra-MajemCIBER: CB12/03/30038 Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y la Nutrición, CIBERobn, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain.
Gregorio Varela-MoreirasSpanish Nutrition Foundation (FEN), Madrid, Spain.
Marcela González-GrossImFINE Research Group, Department of Health and Human Performance, Technical University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain. marcela.gonzalez.gross@upm.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn increase of sedentary behaviors far from the Mediterranean lifestyle is happening in spite of the impact on health. The aims of this study were to describe sedentary behaviors in children and adolescents.

methodsA representative sample of 424 Spanish children and adolescents (38% females) involved in the ANIBES study was analyzed regarding their sedentary behaviors, together with the availability of televisions, computers, and consoles by means of the HELENA sedentary behavior questionnaire.

resultsFor the total sample of children, 49.3% during weekdays and 84% during weekends did not meet the recommendation of less than 2 hours of screen viewing per day. The use of TV was higher during weekdays (p < 0.05) and there were significant differences between adolescents and children (16.9 vs. 25.1%, p < 0.05). The use of computer, console games and of internet for non-study reasons was higher during weekends (p < 0.001). Adolescents played more computer games and used more internet for non-study reasons than children during both weekdays and weekends (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). The use of internet for academic reasons was lower in children (p < 0.001) than adolescents during weekends; however, no significant differences were found between sexes. In addition, more than 30% of the children and adolescents had at least one electronic device in their bedrooms.

conclusionsSpanish children and adolescents are not meeting the recommendations regarding the maximum of screen viewing (<2 h/day), especially during the weekend, for all of sedentary behaviors. Urgent strategies and intervention studies are needed to reduce sedentary behavior in young people.

Indexed as

Sedentary BehaviorAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorChildComputersFemaleHumansInternetMaleSpainSurveys and QuestionnairesTelevisionTime FactorsVideo GamesANIBES StudyChildPhysical activitySedentary lifestyleYouth

Identifiers

PMID28103843
PMCPMC5244608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.