Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28103483›Full record

ArticleNeuron2017

Dynamic Interaction between Reinforcement Learning and Attention in Multidimensional Environments.

Yuan Chang Leong, Angela Radulescu, Reka Daniel, Vivian DeWoskin, Yael Niv

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 150 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Human Cerebellum Encodes Temporally Sensitive Reinforcement Learning Signals.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neural representations of beliefs in a multi-dimensional inference task.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Attentional Mechanisms for Learning Feature Combinations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuan Chang LeongDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: ycleong@stanford.edu.
Angela RadulescuDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. Electronic address: angelar@princeton.edu.
Reka DanielDstillery, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Vivian DeWoskinTrinity Partners, San Francisco, CA 94111, USA.
Yael NivDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA; Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. Electronic address: yael@princeton.edu.

Funding

Neural and computational mechanisms of selective attention in experience-based deR01MH098861 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI NIV, YAEL · 2012 to 2014
$1.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH098861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the relationship between attention and learning during decision making. Using eye tracking and multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI data, we measured participants' dimensional attention as they performed a trial-and-error learning task in which only one of three stimulus dimensions was relevant for reward at any given time. Analysis of participants' choices revealed that attention biased both value computation during choice and value update during learning. Value signals in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and prediction errors in the striatum were similarly biased by attention. In turn, participants' focus of attention was dynamically modulated by ongoing learning. Attentional switches across dimensions correlated with activity in a frontoparietal attention network, which showed enhanced connectivity with the ventromedial prefrontal cortex between switches. Our results suggest a bidirectional interaction between attention and learning: attention constrains learning to relevant dimensions of the environment, while we learn what to attend to via trial and error.

Indexed as

EnvironmentReinforcement, PsychologyAdolescentAdultAttentionBrainBrain MappingChoice BehaviorDecision MakingEye Movement MeasurementsFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleattentioncomputational modelingdecision makingfMRIMVPAprediction errorreinforcement learningstriatumvaluevmPFC

Identifiers

PMID28103483
PMCPMC5287409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.