Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28103303›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Driving with Intuition: A Preregistered Study about the EEG Anticipation of Simulated Random Car Accidents.

Gian Marco Duma, Giovanni Mento, Tommaso Manari, Massimiliano Martinelli, Patrizio Tressoldi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gian Marco DumaDipartimento di Psicologia Sociale e dello Sviluppo, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy.
Giovanni MentoDipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy.
Tommaso ManariDipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy.
Massimiliano MartinelliDipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy.
Patrizio TressoldiDipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6404-0058

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of neural pre-stimulus or "anticipatory" activity opened a new window for understanding how the brain actively constructs the forthcoming reality. Usually, experimental paradigms designed to study anticipatory activity make use of stimuli. The purpose of the present study is to expand the study of neural anticipatory activity upon the temporal occurrence of dichotomic, statistically unpredictable (random) stimuli within an ecological experimental paradigm. To this purpose, we used a simplified driving simulation including two possible, randomly-presented trial types: a car crash end trial and a no car crash end trial. Event Related Potentials (ERP) were extracted -3,000 ms before stimulus onset. We identified a fronto-central negativity starting around 1,000 ms before car crash presentation. By contrast, a whole-scalp distributed positivity characterized the anticipatory activity observed before the end of the trial in the no car crash end condition. The present data are in line with the hypothesis that the brain may also anticipate dichotomic, statistically unpredictable stimuli, relaying onto different pre-stimulus ERP activity. Possible integration with car-smart-systems is also suggested.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficAdultAnticipation, PsychologicalAutomobile DrivingBrainComputer SimulationElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansIntuitionMaleReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28103303
PMCPMC5245833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.