Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28103240›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2017

Rfx2 Stabilizes Foxj1 Binding at Chromatin Loops to Enable Multiciliated Cell Gene Expression.

Ian K Quigley, Chris Kintner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Foxn3 is required to suppress aberrant ciliogenesis in nonphotoreceptor retinal neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cilia and transcription: a mini review.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Congenital heart defects caused by FOXJ1.Human molecular genetics · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ian K QuigleyMolecular Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0075-8324
Chris KintnerMolecular Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Salk Institute for Biological Studies · US

Funding

Viral Vector Core (VVC)P30CA014195 · NCI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI Ye Zheng · 1985 to 2026
$82.8M
Molecular Bases of Cilia OrientationR01GM076507 · NIGMS · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI KINTNER, CHRISTOPHER ROBERT · 2005 to 2017
$4.9M
The transcriptional control and function of proton-secreting cellsF32DK084706 · NIDDK · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI QUIGLEY, IAN K. · 2011 to 2013
$161k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014195NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK084706NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cooperative transcription factor binding at cis-regulatory sites in the genome drives robust eukaryotic gene expression, and many such sites must be coordinated to produce coherent transcriptional programs. The transcriptional program leading to motile cilia formation requires members of the DNA-binding forkhead (Fox) and Rfx transcription factor families and these factors co-localize to cilia gene promoters, but it is not clear how many cilia genes are regulated by these two factors, whether these factors act directly or indirectly, or how these factors act with specificity in the context of a 3-dimensional genome. Here, we use genome-wide approaches to show that cilia genes reside at the boundaries of topological domains and that these areas have low enhancer density. We show that the transcription factors Foxj1 and Rfx2 binding occurs in the promoters of more cilia genes than other known cilia transcription factors and that while Rfx2 binds directly to promoters and enhancers equally, Foxj1 prefers direct binding to enhancers and is stabilized at promoters by Rfx2. Finally, we show that Rfx2 and Foxj1 lie at the anchor endpoints of chromatin loops, suggesting that target genes are activated when Foxj1 bound at distal sites is recruited via a loop created by Rfx2 binding at both sites. We speculate that the primary function of Rfx2 is to stabilize distal enhancers with proximal promoters by operating as a scaffolding factor, bringing key regulatory domains bound by Foxj1 into close physical proximity and enabling coordinated cilia gene expression.

Indexed as

Transcriptional ActivationAnimalsChromatinCiliaForkhead Transcription FactorsPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingRegulatory Factor X Transcription FactorsSkinSpecies SpecificityXenopusXenopus ProteinsChromatinForkhead Transcription FactorsFOXJ1 protein, XenopusRegulatory Factor X Transcription FactorsRFX2 protein, XenopusXenopus Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28103240
PMCPMC5245798
OpenAlexW2951129759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.