ArticlePLoS computational biology2017
Ten Simple Rules to Enable Multi-site Collaborations through Data Sharing.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Storm impacts on phytoplankton community dynamics in lakes.Global change biology · 2020Pooled it
- Internal validation protocol for large collaborative clinical data sets: assessment of the CONGRESS database.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026Article
- Integrating AI and RNA biomarkers in cancer: advances in diagnostics and targeted therapies.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025Review
- Transparency in epidemiological analyses of cohort data a case study of the Norwegian mother, father, and child cohort study (MoBa).BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Kidney Disease Aging Research Collaborative (KDARC): Addressing barriers in geriatric nephrology research.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- Eleven quick tips for properly handling tabular data.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Harnessing Generalizable Real-World Ophthalmic Big Data: Descriptive Analysis of the Bodhya Eye Consortium Model for Collaborative Research.Online journal of public health informatics · 2024Article
- Ten simple rules for successfully carrying out funded research projects.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Messing with Merton: The intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values.Accountability in research · 2024Article
- Ten simple rules to make computable knowledge shareable and reusable.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- A practical guide to cross-cultural and multi-sited data collection in the biological and behavioural sciences.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Ten simple rules for managing laboratory information.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- The Environmental Data Initiative: Connecting the past to the future through data reuse.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Ten simple rules for a successful international consortium in big data omics.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Lessons learned and recommendations for data coordination in collaborative research: The CSER consortium experience.HGG advances · 2022Article
- What senior academics can do to support reproducible and open research: a short, three-step guide.BMC research notes · 2022Article
- Common-sense approaches to sharing tabular data alongside publication.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Review
- Open Data Practices among Users of Primary Biodiversity Data.Bioscience · 2021Article
- Brain markers predicting response to cognitive-behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder: an independent replication of Whitfield-Gabrieli et al. 2015.Translational psychiatry · 2021Article
- Embracing the value of research data: Introducing the JCHLA/JABSC Data Sharing Policy.The journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.