ArticleMedical physics2017
Simultaneous PET/MR imaging with a radio frequency-penetrable PET insert.
Article in Medical physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility Study for a Microstrip Transmission Line RF Coil Integrated with a PET Detector Module in a 7T Human MR Imaging System.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Article
- Context-Aware Transformer GAN for Direct Generation of Attenuation and Scatter Corrected PET Data.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2024Article
- New Horizons in Brain PET Instrumentation.PET clinics · 2024Review
- Future Prospects of Positron Emission Tomography-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Hybrid Systems and Applications in Psychiatric Disorders.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Hybrid total-body pet scanners-current status and future perspectives.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Review
- Multimodal phantoms for clinical PET/MRI.EJNMMI physics · 2021Review
- Design and system evaluation of a dual-panel portable PET (DP-PET).EJNMMI physics · 2021Article
- Development of Dedicated Brain PET Imaging Devices: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019Review
- Performance evaluation of RF coils integrated with an RF-penetrable PET insert for simultaneous PET/MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2019Article
- From simultaneous to synergistic MR-PET brain imaging: A review of hybrid MR-PET imaging methodologies.Human brain mapping · 2018Review
- Performance study of a radio-frequency field-penetrable PET insert for simultaneous PET/MRI.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2018Article
- MR Performance in the Presence of a Radio Frequency-Penetrable Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Insert for Simultaneous PET/MRI.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2018Article
- Initial experience with a SiPM-based PET/CT scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality.EJNMMI physics · 2018Article
- Low eddy current RF shielding enclosure designs for 3T MR applications.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeA brain sized radio frequency (RF)-penetrable PET insert has been designed for simultaneous operation with MRI systems. This system takes advantage of electro-optical coupling and battery power to electrically float the PET insert relative to the MRI ground, permitting RF signals to be transmitted through small gaps between the modules that form the PET ring. This design facilitates the use of the built-in body coil for RF transmission and thus could be inserted into any existing MR site wishing to achieve simultaneous PET/MR imaging. The PET detectors employ nonmagnetic silicon photomultipliers in conjunction with a compressed sensing signal multiplexing scheme, and optical fibers to transmit analog PET detector signals out of the MRI room for decoding, processing, and image reconstruction.
methodsThe PET insert was first constructed and tested in a laboratory benchtop setting, where tomographic images of a custom resolution phantom were successfully acquired. The PET insert was then placed within a 3T body MRI system, and tomographic resolution/contrast phantom images were acquired both with only the B
resultsThe resulting PET images have comparable contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) under all MR pulsing conditions: The maximum percent CNR relative difference for each rod type among all four PET images acquired in the MRI system has a mean of 14.0 ± 7.7%. MR images were successfully acquired through the RF-penetrable PET shielding using only the built-in MR body coil, suggesting that simultaneous imaging is possible without significant mutual interference.
conclusionsThese results show promise for this technology as an alternative to costly integrated PET/MR scanners; a PET insert that is compatible with any existing clinical MRI system could greatly increase the availability, accessibility, and dissemination of PET/MR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.