Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28102949›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2017

Simultaneous PET/MR imaging with a radio frequency-penetrable PET insert.

Alexander M Grant, Brian J Lee, Chen-Ming Chang, Craig S Levin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Feasibility Study for a Microstrip Transmission Line RF Coil Integrated with a PET Detector Module in a 7T Human MR Imaging System.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Context-Aware Transformer GAN for Direct Generation of Attenuation and Scatter Corrected PET Data.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Hybrid total-body pet scanners-current status and future perspectives.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Development of Dedicated Brain PET Imaging Devices: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Performance study of a radio-frequency field-penetrable PET insert for simultaneous PET/MRI.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander M GrantStanford University, Departments of Bioengineering, Stanford, CA, USA.
Brian J LeeStanford University, Departments of Radiology, Stanford, CA, USA.
Chen-Ming ChangStanford University, Departments of Radiology, Stanford, CA, USA.
Craig S LevinStanford University, Departments of Bioengineering, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

RF-penetrable PET ring for acquiring simultaneous time-of-flight PET and MRI dataR01EB019465 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LEVIN, CRAIG S · 2015 to 2021
$2.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB019465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA brain sized radio frequency (RF)-penetrable PET insert has been designed for simultaneous operation with MRI systems. This system takes advantage of electro-optical coupling and battery power to electrically float the PET insert relative to the MRI ground, permitting RF signals to be transmitted through small gaps between the modules that form the PET ring. This design facilitates the use of the built-in body coil for RF transmission and thus could be inserted into any existing MR site wishing to achieve simultaneous PET/MR imaging. The PET detectors employ nonmagnetic silicon photomultipliers in conjunction with a compressed sensing signal multiplexing scheme, and optical fibers to transmit analog PET detector signals out of the MRI room for decoding, processing, and image reconstruction.

methodsThe PET insert was first constructed and tested in a laboratory benchtop setting, where tomographic images of a custom resolution phantom were successfully acquired. The PET insert was then placed within a 3T body MRI system, and tomographic resolution/contrast phantom images were acquired both with only the B

resultsThe resulting PET images have comparable contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) under all MR pulsing conditions: The maximum percent CNR relative difference for each rod type among all four PET images acquired in the MRI system has a mean of 14.0 ± 7.7%. MR images were successfully acquired through the RF-penetrable PET shielding using only the built-in MR body coil, suggesting that simultaneous imaging is possible without significant mutual interference.

conclusionsThese results show promise for this technology as an alternative to costly integrated PET/MR scanners; a PET insert that is compatible with any existing clinical MRI system could greatly increase the availability, accessibility, and dissemination of PET/MR.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedRadio WavesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhantoms, ImagingPositron-Emission TomographySignal-To-Noise RatioTime Factorsimage reconstructionmultimodalityPET detectorsPET/MRIpositron emission tomographyRF-penetrable

Identifiers

PMID28102949
PMCPMC5372382
OpenAlexW2560095552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.