Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28102784›Full record

ReviewVirulence2017

Model systems for the study of Enterococcal colonization and infection.

H M Sharon Goh, M H Adeline Yong, Kelvin Kian Long Chong, Kimberly A Kline

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Virulence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Communications biology · 2019
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Draft genome sequences forMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A rabbit model of acute bacteremia and sepsis caused by vancomycin-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Genomic Characterization of Antibiotic-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2026
    Article
  11. Draft genome sequences forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Metabolites · 2025
    Review
  14. Insights into ecology, pathogenesis, and biofilm formation ofMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Estrogen and bacterial infection.Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  17. Journal of oral microbiology · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H M Sharon Goha Singapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, School of Biological Sciences , Nanyang Technological University , Singapore.
M H Adeline Yonga Singapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, School of Biological Sciences , Nanyang Technological University , Singapore.
Kelvin Kian Long Chonga Singapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, School of Biological Sciences , Nanyang Technological University , Singapore.
Kimberly A Klinea Singapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, School of Biological Sciences , Nanyang Technological University , Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-5472-3074
Nanyang Technological University · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium are common inhabitants of the human gastrointestinal tract, as well as frequent opportunistic pathogens. Enterococci cause a range of infections including, most frequently, infections of the urinary tract, catheterized urinary tract, bloodstream, wounds and surgical sites, and heart valves in endocarditis. Enterococcal infections are often biofilm-associated, polymicrobial in nature, and resistant to antibiotics of last resort. Understanding Enterococcal mechanisms of colonization and pathogenesis are important for identifying new ways to manage and intervene with these infections. We review vertebrate and invertebrate model systems applied to study the most common E. faecalis and E. faecium infections, with emphasis on recent findings examining Enterococcal-host interactions using these models. We discuss strengths and shortcomings of each model, propose future animal models not yet applied to study mono- and polymicrobial infections involving E. faecalis and E. faecium, and comment on the significance of anti-virulence strategies derived from a fundamental understanding of host-pathogen interactions in model systems.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsEnterococcus faecalisEnterococcus faeciumGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHumansAnti-Bacterial Agentsanimal modelsEnterococcus faecalisEnterococcus faeciummodel hostspolymicrobial infectionvirulence factors

Identifiers

PMID28102784
PMCPMC5810481
OpenAlexW2578766314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.