Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28102620›Full record

ArticleJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2017

When does speech sound disorder matter for literacy? The role of disordered speech errors, co-occurring language impairment and family risk of dyslexia.

Marianna E Hayiou-Thomas, Julia M Carroll, Ruth Leavett, Charles Hulme, Margaret J Snowling

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Educational outcomes associated with persistent speech disorder.International journal of language & communication disorders · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Marianna E Hayiou-ThomasDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.
Julia M CarrollCentre for Research in Psychology, Behaviour and Achievement, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Ruth LeavettChildren's Therapy Service, York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK.
Charles HulmeDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Margaret J SnowlingDepartment of Experimental Psychology and St John's College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Coventry University · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of York · GBYork Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust WT082036MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study considers the role of early speech difficulties in literacy development, in the context of additional risk factors.

methodChildren were identified with speech sound disorder (SSD) at the age of 3½ years, on the basis of performance on the Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology. Their literacy skills were assessed at the start of formal reading instruction (age 5½), using measures of phoneme awareness, word-level reading and spelling; and 3 years later (age 8), using measures of word-level reading, spelling and reading comprehension.

resultsThe presence of early SSD conferred a small but significant risk of poor phonemic skills and spelling at the age of 5½ and of poor word reading at the age of 8. Furthermore, within the group with SSD, the persistence of speech difficulties to the point of school entry was associated with poorer emergent literacy skills, and children with 'disordered' speech errors had poorer word reading skills than children whose speech errors indicated 'delay'. In contrast, the initial severity of SSD was not a significant predictor of reading development. Beyond the domain of speech, the presence of a co-occurring language impairment was strongly predictive of literacy skills and having a family risk of dyslexia predicted additional variance in literacy at both time-points.

conclusionsEarly SSD alone has only modest effects on literacy development but when additional risk factors are present, these can have serious negative consequences, consistent with the view that multiple risks accumulate to predict reading disorders.

Indexed as

LiteracyChildChild, PreschoolComorbidityDyslexiaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLanguage Development DisordersMaleRisk FactorsSpeech Sound Disorderdisordered speech errorsfamily risk of dyslexialanguage impairmentliteracySpeech sound disorder

Identifiers

PMID28102620
PMCPMC5297982
OpenAlexW2551387698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.