Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28102513›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017

Incidence of Cryptosporidium andersoni in diarrheal patients from southern Assam, India: a molecular approach.

G Hussain, S Roychoudhury, B Singha, J Paul

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genetic characterizations ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
  9. An Update on ZoonoticAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  10. ZoonoticMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Identification of UncommonFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G HussainMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, Gurucharan College, Silchar, 788004, Assam, India.
S RoychoudhuryDepartment of Life Science and Bioinformatics, Assam University, Silchar, 788011, Assam, India.
B SinghaMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, Gurucharan College, Silchar, 788004, Assam, India. babysingha@gmail.com.
J PaulSchool of Life Science, Jawaharlal Nehru University, 110067, Delhi, India.
Assam University · INJawaharlal Nehru University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The distribution and public health significance of Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in humans and bovine differ across geographical areas. Cryptosporidium species causes a disease known as cryptosporidiosis in humans and animals. To characterize the prevalence of cryptosporidiosis in humans in southern Assam, India, stool samples (n = 1119) of diarrhea patients were collected from different hospitals and from the community during the period January 2014 to July 2016. Fecal smears were examined microscopically for Cryptosporidium species using modified acid fast staining and were screened to ascertain the presence of Cryptosporidium antigen by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The genomic DNA of positive fecal samples were analyzed by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which were subsequently genotyped by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), based on small subunit (SSU) 18S rRNA. It was found that the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. was high during the monsoon season. The average infection rate of Cryptosporidium spp. was found to be 2.4% (27/1119) microscopically. When subjected to nested PCR using amplification of the 18S rRNA gene, Cryptosporidium was found to be 8.57% (98/1119). Based on the 18S rRNA gene, two Cryptosporidium spp., namely Cryptosporidium andersoni (6.97%: 78/1119) and Cryptosporidium parvum (1.7%: 20/1119), were identified. Cryptosporidium andersoni infections were found to be of either zoonotic or anthroponotic origin. The prevalence was statistically significant (p = 0.03, R

Indexed as

Molecular Diagnostic TechniquesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidiumDiarrheaDNA, ProtozoanDNA, RibosomalEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFecesFemaleDNA, ProtozoanDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID28102513
OpenAlexW2574091792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.