Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28102500›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2017

Rates and Predictors of Caesarean Section for First and Second Births: A Prospective Cohort of Australian Women.

Alexis Hure, Jennifer Powers, Catherine Chojenta, Deborah Loxton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Regional differences in autism and intellectual disability risk associated with cesarean section delivery.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Robson's Ten Group Classification System to Evaluate Cesarean Section Rates in Honduras: The Relevance of Labor Induction.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexis HureResearch Centre for Generational Health and Ageing, Hunter Medical Research Institute, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Level 3 Pod, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. Alexis.Hure@newcastle.edu.au.
Jennifer PowersResearch Centre for Generational Health and Ageing, Hunter Medical Research Institute, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Level 3 Pod, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Catherine ChojentaResearch Centre for Generational Health and Ageing, Hunter Medical Research Institute, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Level 3 Pod, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Deborah LoxtonResearch Centre for Generational Health and Ageing, Hunter Medical Research Institute, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Level 3 Pod, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective To determine rates of vaginal delivery, emergency caesarean section, and elective caesarean section for first and second births in Australia, and to identify maternal predictors of caesarean section. Methods Data were from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. A total of 5275 women aged 18-38 years, who had given birth to their first child between 1996 and 2012 were included; 75.0% (n = 3956) had delivered a second child. Mode of delivery for first and second singleton birth(s) was obtained from longitudinal survey data. Socio-demographic, lifestyle, anthropometric and medical history variables were tested as predictors of mode of delivery for first and second births using multinomial logistic regression. Results Caesarean sections accounted for 29.1% (n = 1535) of first births, consisting of 18.2% emergency and 10.9% elective caesareans. Mode of delivery for first and second births was consistent for 85.5% of women (n = 3383) who delivered both children either vaginally or via caesarean section. Higher maternal age and body mass index, short-stature, anxiety and having private health insurance were predictive of caesarean section for first births. Vaginal birth after caesarean section was more common in women who were older, short-statured, or had been overweight or obese for both children, compared to women who had two vaginal deliveries. Conclusions for Practice Rates of caesarean section in Australia are high. Renewed efforts are needed to reduce the number of unnecessary caesarean births, with particular caution applied to first births. Interventions could focus on elective caesareans for women with private health insurance or a history of anxiety.

Indexed as

Birth OrderAdolescentAdultAlcoholismAustraliaBody Mass IndexBody WeightCesarean SectionCohort StudiesDelivery, ObstetricElective Surgical ProceduresExerciseFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesBirthCaesareanDeliveryElectiveEmergencyLabourVaginal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.