Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28102457›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2018

Prevalence of vertebral fracture and densitometric osteoporosis in Spanish adult men: The Camargo Cohort Study.

José M Olmos, José L Hernández, Josefina Martínez, Emilio Pariente, Jesús Castillo, Daniel Prieto-Alhambra, Jesús González-Macías

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

José M OlmosDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla-IDIVAL, Universidad de Cantabria, Avda. Valdecilla s/n. 39008, Santander, Spain. miromj@humv.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7765-0891
José L HernándezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla-IDIVAL, Universidad de Cantabria, Avda. Valdecilla s/n. 39008, Santander, Spain.
Josefina MartínezClinical Biochemistry Service, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla-IDIVAL, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain.
Emilio ParienteCentro de Salud de Camargo, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain.
Jesús CastilloCentro de Salud de Camargo, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain.
Daniel Prieto-AlhambraGREMPAL Research Group, Idiap Jordi Gol Primary Care Research Institute, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, RETICEF, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain.
Jesús González-MacíasDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla-IDIVAL, Universidad de Cantabria, Avda. Valdecilla s/n. 39008, Santander, Spain.

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI15/00521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of densitometric osteoporosis and vertebral fractures in Spanish men aged ≥50 years, and to study how the relationship between them may change depending on how osteoporosis is diagnosed. A community-based population of 1003 men aged ≥50 years was studied. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by DXA at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip. Vertebral fractures were assessed by lateral thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs. The prevalence of osteoporosis was estimated with both the World Health Organization (WHO) (T-score of <-2.5 at the femoral neck, calculated using the young white female normal reference database) and the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) criteria (T-score of <-2.5 at the femoral neck, total hip or lumbar spine, calculated using the young white male normal reference database). The prevalence of osteoporosis using the WHO criterion was 1.1% and using the NOF criterion was 13%, while that of vertebral fractures was 21.3%. The area under the curve (AUC) for the relationship between BMD and vertebral fracture prevalence was 0.64. The odds ratio for osteoporosis using the WHO definition was 2.57 (p = 0.13), and 1.78 (p = 0.007) using the NOF definition. Vertebral fracture prevalence rose with age. The prevalence of osteoporosis increased only moderately in men aged >70 years with the WHO criterion, and showed no change using the NOF definition. The prevalence of osteoporosis in Spanish men using the WHO definition is too small to have any meaningful clinical use. Although the figure is higher using the NOF definition, it would seem that population-based studies of BMD in men are of questionable value.

Indexed as

DensitometryAdultAgedArea Under CurveBone DensityCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioOsteoporosisPrevalenceRisk FactorsROC CurveBone mineral densityMenOsteoporosisVertebral fracture

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.