ArticleScientific reports2017
Qualitative and quantitative analysis with a novel shear wave speed imaging for differential diagnosis of breast lesions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Shear Wave Elastography in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Lesions: A Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Pooled it
- Shear-wave dispersion imaging outperforms shear-wave elastography in small lesions and BI-RADS 4B classification.European radiology · 2026Article
- Correlation between axial length and the elasticity of the posterior segment of eyeball in myopic eyes without posterior staphyloma: a shear wave elastography-based cross-sectional study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Article
- Analyzing the Usage of Shear-Wave Elastography in Evaluating Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Literature Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Liver Elastography Methods for Diagnosis of De Novo and Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Responsive Supramolecular Polymers for Diagnosis and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Reliability of Sonoelastography Measurement of Tongue Muscles and Its Application on Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Frontiers of cancer imaging and guided therapy using ultrasound, light, and microwaves.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2018Review
- Quantitative Elastography Methods in Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Radiology · 2018Review
- Value of shear wave arrival time contour display in shear wave elastography for breast masses diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a new two-dimensional shear wave speed (SWS) imaging (i.e. Toshiba shear wave elastography, T-SWE) in differential diagnosis of breast lesions. 225 pathologically confirmed breast lesions in 218 patients were subject to conventional ultrasound and T-SWE examinations. The mean, standard deviation and ratio of SWS values (m/s) and elastic modulus (KPa) on T-SWE were computed. Besides, the 2D elastic images were classified into four color patterns. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of T-SWE in differentiation of breast lesions. Compared with other quantitative T-SWE parameters, mean value expressed in KPa had the highest AUROC value (AUROC = 0.943), with corresponding cut-off value of 36.1 KPa, sensitivity of 85.1%, specificity of 96.6%, accuracy of 94.2%, PPV of 87.0%, and NPV of 96.1%. The AUROC of qualitative color patterns in this study obtained the best performance (AUROC = 0.957), while the differences were not significant except for that of Eratio expressed in m/s (AUROC = 0.863) (P = 0.03). In summary, qualitative color patterns of T-SWE obtained the best performance in all parameters, while mean stiffness (36.05 KPa) provided the best diagnostic performance in the quantitative parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.