Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28102262›Full record

ReviewNature2017

Scaling single-cell genomics from phenomenology to mechanism.

Amos Tanay, Aviv Regev

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 435 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
435citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

435 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. iScience · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The roles and heterogeneity of CD8International journal of molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  20. Review

375 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amos TanayDepartment of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Aviv RegevBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.

Funding

Center for Cell CircuitsRM1HG006193 · NHGRI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI BLAINEY, PAUL CLARK, HACOHEN, NIR · 2016 to 2020
$14.9M
Trinity: Transcriptome assembly for genetic and functional analysis of cancerU24CA180922 · NCI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI HAAS, BRIAN · 2013 to 2022
$7.5M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS U24 CA180922NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG006193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three of the most fundamental questions in biology are how individual cells differentiate to form tissues, how tissues function in a coordinated and flexible fashion and which gene regulatory mechanisms support these processes. Single-cell genomics is opening up new ways to tackle these questions by combining the comprehensive nature of genomics with the microscopic resolution that is required to describe complex multicellular systems. Initial single-cell genomic studies provided a remarkably rich phenomenology of heterogeneous cellular states, but transforming observational studies into models of dynamics and causal mechanisms in tissues poses fresh challenges and requires stronger integration of theoretical, computational and experimental frameworks.

Indexed as

GenomicsModels, GeneticAnimalsGene Expression RegulationHumansSingle-Cell AnalysisSpatio-Temporal Analysis

Identifiers

PMID28102262
PMCPMC5438464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.