Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28102037›Full record

ReviewHLA2017

In celebration of Ruggero Ceppellini: HLA in transplantation.

E W Petersdorf

Open access · greenAbstract readBiographyHistorical ArticlePortrait
In one paragraph

Review in HLA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Identification of peripheral CD154Clinical and experimental immunology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

E W PetersdorfFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Clinical Research, Seattle, Washington.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

VIRUS-MEDIATED MYELOSUPPRESSIONP01CA018029 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Geoffrey Roger HILL · 1985 to 2026
$128.4M
Hematopopietic Stem Cell TransplantationU01AI069197 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Effie W Petersdorf · 2005 to 2026
$18.9M
Clinical Significance of MHC Haplotypes in Hematopoietic Cell TransplantationR01CA100019 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI PETERSDORF, EFFIE W · 2003 to 2025
$9.1M
Genetic Mechanisms of Survivorship Disparities after Unrelated HCTU01CA162194 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI PETERSDORF, EFFIE W · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA018029NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100019NCI NIH HHS U01 CA162194NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of hematopoietic cell transplantation as curative therapy for blood disorders has been dramatically improved through a better understanding of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) barrier. Although a fully compatible unrelated donor is preferable, transplantation from donors with a limited degree of HLA mismatching is associated with acceptable outcomes in many cases. Research on the limits of HLA mismatching, and the features that define permissible HLA mismatches will continue to enable transplantation to be more broadly available to patients in need.

Indexed as

RegistriesAllelesAllergy and ImmunologyGraft vs Host DiseaseHematologic DiseasesHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHistocompatibility TestingHistory, 20th CenturyHLA AntigensHumansItalyMyeloablative AgonistsTransplantation ConditioningTransplantation, HomologousUnrelated DonorsWorkforceHLA AntigensMyeloablative Agonistsexpressionhaplotypehematopoietic cell transplantationHLAmatchingunrelated donor

Identifiers

PMID28102037
PMCPMC5267337
OpenAlexW2572840964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.