Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28101835›Full record

ArticleJournal of gambling studies2017

Relationships Between Perceived Family Gambling and Peer Gambling and Adolescent Problem Gambling and Binge-Drinking.

Zu Wei Zhai, Sarah W Yip, Marvin A Steinberg, Jeremy Wampler, Rani A Hoff, Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin, Marc N Potenza

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Gambling Factors Related with the Level of Adolescent Problem Gambler.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zu Wei ZhaiDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA. zuwei.zhai@yale.edu.
Sarah W YipDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Marvin A SteinbergThe Connecticut Council on Problem Gambling, Clinton, CT, 06413, USA.
Jeremy WamplerProblem Gambling Services, Middletown, CT, 06457, USA.
Rani A HoffDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Suchitra Krishnan-SarinDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Marc N PotenzaDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Yale University · USConnecticut Mental Health Center · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Research Training Program in Substance Use PreventionT32DA019426 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI TAMI P SULLIVAN · 2005 to 2026
$7.5M
fMRI of Craving in Addictions: Gender DifferencesR01DA019039 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI POTENZA, MARC N · 2005 to 2009
$1.6M
fMRI of Stress & Self-Control in Smoking & Obesity (7 of 14)RL1AA017539 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI POTENZA, MARC N · 2007 to 2011
$1.3M
Neural mechanisms of galantamine treatment for cocaine dependenceK01DA039299 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI YIP, SARAH · 2016 to 2020
$905k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIAAA NIH HHS RL1 AA017539NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA039299NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019039NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA019426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study systematically examined the relative relationships between perceived family and peer gambling and adolescent at-risk/problem gambling and binge-drinking. It also determined the likelihood of at-risk/problem gambling and binge-drinking as a function of the number of different social groups with perceived gambling. A multi-site high-school survey assessed gambling, alcohol use, presence of perceived excessive peer gambling (peer excess-PE), and family gambling prompting concern (family concern-FC) in 2750 high-school students. Adolescents were separately stratified into: (1) low-risk, at-risk, and problem/pathological gambling groups; and, (2) non-binge-drinking, low-frequency-binge-drinking, and high-frequency-binge-drinking groups. Multinomial logistic regression showed that relative to each other, FC and PE were associated with greater likelihoods of at-risk and problem/pathological gambling. However, only FC was associated with binge-drinking. Logistic regression revealed that adolescents who endorsed either FC or PE alone, compared to no endorsement, were more likely to have at-risk and problem/pathological gambling, relative to low-risk gambling. Adolescents who endorsed both FC and PE, compared to PE alone, were more likely to have problem/pathological gambling relative to low-risk and at-risk gambling. Relative to non-binge-drinking adolescents, those who endorsed both FC and PE were more likely to have low- and high-frequency-binge-drinking compared to FC alone or PE alone, respectively. Family and peer gambling individually contribute to adolescent at-risk/problem gambling and binge-drinking. Strategies that target adolescents as well as their closely affiliated family and peer members may be an important step towards prevention of harm-associated levels of gambling and alcohol use in youths.

Indexed as

Peer GroupAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAlcohol DrinkingFemaleGamblingHumansLogistic ModelsMaleRisk-TakingSocial EnvironmentStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescenceAlcoholBinge drinkingFamilyPeersProblem gambling

Identifiers

PMID28101835
PMCPMC5515696
OpenAlexW2574375804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.