Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28101825›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2017

Neurosarcoidosis: clinical presentations and changing treatment patterns in an Irish Caucasian population.

K O'Connell, L Williams, J Jones, D J H McCabe, D Murphy, R Killeen, N Tubridy, S O'Riordan, C McGuigan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Neurosarcoidosis: clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment in eight Chinese patients.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

K O'ConnellDepartment of Neurology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland. k.oconnell@svuh.ie.
L WilliamsDepartment of Neurology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
J JonesDepartment of Neurology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
D J H McCabeDepartment of Neurology, The Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, Incorporating the National Children's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
D MurphySchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
R KilleenSchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
N TubridyDepartment of Neurology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
S O'RiordanDepartment of Neurology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
C McGuiganDepartment of Neurology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
St. Vincent's University Hospital · IEUniversity College Dublin · IEThe Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical manifestations of neurosarcoidosis are highly variable and it should be considered as a potential differential diagnosis in any neurological presentation.

aimThis study was designed to describe the clinical, diagnostic, and treatment patterns and functional outcome in a Caucasian neurosarcoidosis population.

designA retrospective analysis was performed on prospectively recorded data in patients attending our neurology clinic between 2008 and 2014 with a diagnosis of definite or probable neurosarcoidosis according to Zajiek criteria.

methodsDetailed clinical features, baseline demographic data, results of investigations, treatment type and duration, and clinical outcomes were collated.

resultsEleven patients were identified (55% men) with mean age 39 years (range 21-63). Four had a prior history of systemic sarcoidosis leading to earlier diagnosis (6.7 vs 13.1 months). Six were found to have evidence of systemic sarcoidosis on further investigation and one was biopsy proven isolated neurosarcoidosis. The commonest site of CNS involvement was the cranial nerves (64%), and headache (45%) was the most frequent presenting symptom. MRI abnormalities included leptomeningeal enhancement, white matter lesions, acute arteritis, spinal cord lesion, and cauda equina enhancement. The commonest CSF finding was raised protein (n = 6) and a lymphocytic pleocytosis (n = 7). Serum ACE was only elevated in three cases. Ten patients were treated with both corticosteroids and steroid-sparing agents 8 of whom went into remission.

conclusionsThis series highlights the diverse nature of neurosarcoidosis. Early introduction of aggressive therapy with corticosteroids and steroid-sparing agents appears to improve clinical outcome.

Indexed as

AdultCentral Nervous System DiseasesFemaleHumansImmunotherapyIrelandMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSarcoidosisYoung AdultImmunosuppressive therapyNeurosarcoidosis

Identifiers

PMID28101825
OpenAlexW2572683118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.