Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28101719›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2017

In Patients with a Soft Pancreas, a Thick Parenchyma, a Small Duct, and Fatty Infiltration Are Significant Risks for Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Motokazu Sugimoto, Shinichiro Takahashi, Motohiro Kojima, Tatsushi Kobayashi, Naoto Gotohda, Masaru Konishi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Motokazu SugimotoDepartment of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwa-no-ha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan. msugimot@east.ncc.go.jp.
Shinichiro TakahashiDepartment of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwa-no-ha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Motohiro KojimaDivision of Pathology, Research Center for Innovative Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwa-no-ha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Tatsushi KobayashiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwa-no-ha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Naoto GotohdaDepartment of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwa-no-ha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Masaru KonishiDepartment of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwa-no-ha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
National Cancer Center Hospital East · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study sought to characterize soft and hard pancreatic textures radiologically and histologically, and to identify specific risks in a soft pancreas associated with postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) formation after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

methodsConsecutive 145 patients who underwent PD at a single institution between January 2010 and May 2013 were studied. Pancreatic consistency was intraoperatively judged as soft or hard. Pancreatic configuration was assessed using preoperative CT. Histologic components of the pancreatic stump were evaluated using a morphometric analysis. Clinicopathologic parameters were then analyzed for the risk of clinically relevant POPF.

resultsCompared with patients with a hard pancreas (n = 66), those with a soft pancreas (n = 79) had a smaller main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter and a larger parenchymal thickness on CT, had a smaller fibrosis ratio and a larger lobular ratio histologically, and developed clinically relevant POPF more frequently (P < 0.001 for all). In patients with a soft pancreas, an MPD diameter <2 mm, a parenchymal thickness ≥10 mm, a lobular ratio <75%, and a fat ratio ≥20% were independently associated with clinically relevant POPF (P < 0.010 for all).

conclusionIn patients with a soft pancreas, a thick parenchyma, a small MPD, and fatty infiltration were strongly associated with clinically relevant POPF after PD.

Indexed as

AgedAnastomosis, SurgicalDigestive System NeoplasmsFemaleFibrosisHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyPancreasPancreatic DuctsPancreatic FistulaPancreaticoduodenectomyRisk FactorsFatty pancreasPancreatic lobulesPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative pancreatic fistulaSoft pancreas

Identifiers

PMID28101719
OpenAlexW2576154947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.