Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28101654›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2017

Cell viability and shock wave amplitudes in the endothelium of porcine cornea exposed to ultrashort laser pulses.

Syed Asad Hussain, Carles Milián, Caroline Crotti, Laura Kowalczuk, Fatima Alahyane, Zacaria Essaïdi, Arnaud Couairon, Marie-Claire Schanne-Klein, Karsten Plamann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Syed Asad HussainLOA, ENSTA-ParisTech, École Polytechnique, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 828 bd des Maréchaux, F-91762, Palaiseau, France.
Carles MiliánCentre de Physique Théorique, École Polytechnique, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91128, Palaiseau, France.
Caroline CrottiLOA, ENSTA-ParisTech, École Polytechnique, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 828 bd des Maréchaux, F-91762, Palaiseau, France.
Laura KowalczukLOA, ENSTA-ParisTech, École Polytechnique, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 828 bd des Maréchaux, F-91762, Palaiseau, France.
Fatima AlahyaneLOA, ENSTA-ParisTech, École Polytechnique, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 828 bd des Maréchaux, F-91762, Palaiseau, France.
Zacaria EssaïdiLOA, ENSTA-ParisTech, École Polytechnique, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 828 bd des Maréchaux, F-91762, Palaiseau, France.
Arnaud CouaironCentre de Physique Théorique, École Polytechnique, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91128, Palaiseau, France.
Marie-Claire Schanne-KleinLOB, École polytechnique, CNRS, Inserm 1182, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91128, Palaiseau, France.
Karsten PlamannLOA, ENSTA-ParisTech, École Polytechnique, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 828 bd des Maréchaux, F-91762, Palaiseau, France. Karsten.Plamann@ensta-paristech.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8254-2158
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSome forms of keratoplasty assisted by ultrashort-pulse lasers require performing laser cuts close to the endothelium, which requires the knowledge of "safe" values concerning incision depth and pulse energy preserving endothelial cell viability. Our study aims to determine the thresholds for cell death in porcine corneas exposed to ultrashort laser pulses, in terms of laser pulse energy and nearness of the impacts to the endothelium.

methodsUsing a laboratory laser set-up, lamellar cuts were induced while varying pulse energies and distances from the endothelium. A fluorescent staining protocol was used to determine the percentage of surviving endothelial cells. Numerical simulations of the Euler equations for compressible fluids provided pressure level and axial and radial pressure gradient estimates at the endothelium.

resultsNinety percent of the endothelial cells survived when using 16.5 μJ pulses no closer than 200 μm to the endothelium, or pulses not exceeding 2 μJ at a distance of 50 μm. The comparison of the observed percentage of surviving cells with the estimates of the shock wave amplitudes and gradients generated by the laser pulses yielded cell death thresholds at amplitudes in the megapascal range, or gradients of the order of 10

conclusionsOur results provide limits in terms of pulse energy and distance of the incision from the endothelium within which endothelial cell viability is preserved. Current forms of corneal laser surgery are compatible with these limits. However, these limits will need to be considered for the development of future laser routines working in close proximity to the endothelium.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DeathCell SurvivalCorneal Surgery, LaserEndothelium, CornealMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningModels, AnimalSwineTomography, Optical CoherenceCell viabilityCorneaEndotheliumKeratoplastyLaser surgeryUltrashort pulse

Identifiers

PMID28101654
OpenAlexW2577396942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.