Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28101651›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2017

Eslicarbazepine acetate: its effectiveness as adjunctive therapy in clinical trials and open studies.

S D Shorvon, E Trinka, B J Steinhoff, M Holtkamp, V Villanueva, J Peltola, E Ben-Menachem

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

S D ShorvonUCL Institute of Neurology, Box 5, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK. s.shorvon@ucl.ac.uk.
E TrinkaDepartment of Neurology and Neuroscience Institute at Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Ignaz Harrerstrasse 79, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
B J SteinhoffEpilepsiezentrum Kork, Landstraße 1, 77694, Kehl-Kork, Germany.
M HoltkampEpilepsy-Center Berlin-Brandenburg, Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
V VillanuevaMultidisciplinary Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Service, Hospital Universitario y Polotécnico La Fe, Avda Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
J PeltolaDepartment of Neurology, Tampere University Hospital, PO Box 2000, 33521, Tampere, Finland.
E Ben-MenachemInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Göteborg, Box 430, SE-405 30, Göteborg, Sweden.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEDiakonie Kork · DEHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBParacelsus Medical University · ATTampere University · FIUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily antiepileptic drug that is approved as adjunctive therapy in adults with focal-onset seizures. Following oral administration, ESL is rapidly metabolized to its active metabolite, eslicarbazepine, which acts primarily by enhancing slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels. The efficacy and safety/tolerability of ESL in the adjunctive setting were established in a comprehensive Phase III program (n = 1702 randomized patients) and this evidence has been supported by several open studies (n = 864). ESL treatment has demonstrated improvements in health-related quality of life, in both randomized clinical trials and open studies. ESL has also been shown to be usually well tolerated and efficacious when used in the adjunctive setting in elderly patients. The effectiveness of ESL as the only add-on to antiepileptic drug monotherapy has been demonstrated in a multinational study (n = 219), subgroup analyses of which have also shown it to be efficacious and generally well tolerated in patients who had previously not responded to carbamazepine therapy. Open studies have also demonstrated improvements in tolerability in patients switched overnight from oxcarbazepine to ESL. Due to differences in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and metabolism, there may be clinical situations in which it is appropriate to consider switching patients from oxcarbazepine or carbamazepine to ESL.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDibenzazepinesDrug SubstitutionEpilepsies, PartialHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSeizuresAnticonvulsantsDibenzazepineseslicarbazepine acetateAdjunctive therapyAntiepileptic drugClinical practiceEpilepsyEslicarbazepine acetateFocal-onset seizures

Identifiers

PMID28101651
PMCPMC5336540
OpenAlexW2578414214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.