ReviewAdvanced pharmaceutical bulletin2016
Vitamins, Are They Safe?
Review in Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drugs for preventing lung cancer in healthy people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Randomised trial of population-based BRCA testing in Ashkenazi Jews: long-term secondary lifestyle behavioural outcomes.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2022Trial
- Vitamin E Protects Against Gestational Deep Vein Thrombosis: The Role of Inhibiting Endothelial Ferroptosis.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- Use of dietary supplements by individuals with dementia - the caregivers' perspective.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025Article
- Brown and beige adipose tissue-derived metabokine and lipokine inter-organ signalling in health and disease.Experimental physiology · 2025Review
- Exploring the link between fat-soluble vitamins and aging-associated immune system status: a literature review.Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2025Review
- The dual role of vitamin C in cancer: from antioxidant prevention to prooxidant therapeutic applications.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Associations between leukocyte telomere length and three measures of folate status: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 1999-2002.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- The Policy of Compulsory Large-Scale Food Fortification in Sub-Saharan Africa.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Association between dietary folate intake and the risk of osteoporosis in adults: a cross-sectional study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- General practitioners' role in safeguarding patients with dementia in their use of dietary supplements. A qualitative study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2024Article
- B Vitamins, Glucoronolactone and the Immune System: Bioavailability, Doses and Efficiency.Nutrients · 2023Review
- Applications of Dietary Supplements and Aromatherapy for Prophylactic and Treatment Purposes During COVID-19 Pandemic.Turkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2023Article
- Emerging cellular senescence-centric understanding of immunological aging and its potential modulation through dietary bioactive components.Biogerontology · 2022Review
- Potential harms of supplementation with high doses of antioxidants in athletes.Journal of exercise science and fitness · 2022Review
- Oxidative Stress in Tauopathies: From Cause to Therapy.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Dietary supplements intake during the second wave of COVID-19 pandemic: A multinational Middle Eastern study.European journal of integrative medicine · 2022Article
- Relationship between urinary cotinine and serum vitamin A levels in Korean adults: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), 2016-2018.The Journal of international medical research · 2021Article
- Dietary recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic.Nutrition reviews · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The consumption of a daily multivitamin among people all over the world is dramatically increasing in recent years. Most of the people believe that if vitamins are not effective, at least they are safe. However, the long term health consequences of vitamins consumption are unknown. This study aimed to assess the side effects and possible harmful and detrimental properties of vitamins and to discuss whether vitamins can be used as safe health products or dietary supplements. We performed a MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar search and assessed reference lists of the included studies which were published from 1993 through 2015. The studies, with an emphasis on RCTs (randomized controlled clinical trials), were reviewed. As some vitamins such as fat-soluble vitamins (vitamin A, vitamin D, vitamin E), and also some of the water-soluble vitamins like folic acid may cause adverse events and some like vitamin C is widely taken assuming that it has so many benefits and no harm, we included relevant studies with negative or undesired results regarding the effect of these vitamins on health. Our recommendation is that taking high-dose supplements of vitamins A, E, D, C, and folic acid is not always effective for prevention of disease, and it can even be harmful to the health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.