Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28101412›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2017

Visualization of micro-capillaries using optical coherence tomography angiography with and without adaptive optics.

Matthias Salas, Marco Augustin, Laurin Ginner, Abhishek Kumar, Bernhard Baumann, Rainer Leitgeb, Wolfgang Drexler, Sonja Prager, Julia Hafner, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Advances in OCT Angiography.Translational vision science & technology · 2025
    Review
  4. Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Artifacts and artifact removal in optical coherence tomographic angiography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Matthias SalasCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20 A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Marco AugustinCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20 A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Laurin GinnerCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20 A-1090 Vienna, Austria; Christian Doppler Laboratory for Innovative Optical Imaging and Its Translation to Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20 A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Abhishek KumarCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20 A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Bernhard BaumannCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20 A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Rainer LeitgebCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20 A-1090 Vienna, Austria; Christian Doppler Laboratory for Innovative Optical Imaging and Its Translation to Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20 A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang DrexlerCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20 A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Sonja PragerDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20 A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Julia HafnerDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20 A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Ursula Schmidt-ErfurthDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20 A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Michael PircherCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20 A-1090 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to investigate the benefits of adaptive optics (AO) technology for optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). OCTA has shown great potential in non-invasively enhancing the contrast of vessels and small capillaries. Especially the capability of the technique to visualize capillaries with a lateral extension that is below the transverse resolution of the system opens unique opportunities in diagnosing retinal vascular diseases. However, there are some limitations of this technology such as shadowing and projection artifacts caused by overlying vasculature or the inability to determine the true extension of a vessel. Thus, the evaluation of the vascular structure and density based on OCTA alone can be misleading. In this paper we compare the performance of AO-OCT, AO-OCTA and OCTA for imaging retinal vasculature. The improved transverse resolution and the reduced depth of focus of AO-OCT and AO-OCTA greatly reduce shadowing artifacts allowing for a better differentiation and segmentation of different vasculature layers of the inner retina. The comparison is done on images recorded in healthy volunteers and in diabetic patients with distinct pathologies of the retinal microvasculature.

Indexed as

(110.1080) Active or adaptive optics(110.4500) Optical coherence tomography(170.3890) Medical optics instrumentation(170.4470) Ophthalmology

Identifiers

PMID28101412
PMCPMC5231293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.