ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2016
Correlation between high perfusion syndrome and stent restenosis after stent implantation.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence and Risk Factors of In-Stent Restenosis for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020Pooled it
- Post-Carotid Artery Stenting Hyperperfusion Syndrome in a Hypotensive Patient: Case Report and Systematic Review of Literature.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study was conducted to determine the correlation between high perfusion syndrome and stent restenosis after cerebral vascular stent implantation. A total of 146 patients diagnosed with cerebral vascular stenosis and stent implantation were selected. A total of 55 cases (37.67%) of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome patients were diagnosed by xenon-enhanced computer tomography (Xe-CT) examination and clinical symptoms within 3 days after surgery and were chosen as the observation group. A total of 91 cases were selected as the control group. After treatment, blood flow of the anterior cerebral artery, middle cerebral artery, posterior cerebral artery, anterior border zone, posterior border zone and the inner border zone of the two groups increased, with values in the observation group increasing more significantly, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The rate of restenosis and target lesion diameter one month and one year after operation in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the mean systolic blood pressure (mSBP), mean diastolic blood pressure (mDBP), stenosis rate of cerebral vascular diameter and high perfusion syndrome were independent risk factors for restenosis (P<0.05). The application of Xe-CT examination is important for early diagnosis of hyperperfusion syndrome. Hyperperfusion syndrome and the occurrence of stent restenosis are closely related. mSBP, mDBP, cerebral blood vessel diameter stenosis rate and high perfusion comprehensive syndrome are the independent risk factors of restenosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.