Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28101093›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2016

Evaluation of the SeedCounter, A Mobile Application for Grain Phenotyping.

Evgenii Komyshev, Mikhail Genaev, Dmitry Afonnikov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fine Mapping of a Vigor QTL in Chickpea (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. QuantifyingBiology open · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Evgenii KomyshevLaboratory of Evolutionary Bioinformatics and Theoretical Genetics, Department of Systems Biology, Institute of Cytology and Genetics Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS) Novosibirsk, Russia.
Mikhail GenaevChair of Informational Biology, Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk, Russia.
Dmitry AfonnikovLaboratory of Evolutionary Bioinformatics and Theoretical Genetics, Department of Systems Biology, Institute of Cytology and Genetics Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS)Novosibirsk, Russia; Chair of Informational Biology, Novosibirsk State UniversityNovosibirsk, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grain morphometry in cereals is an important step in selecting new high-yielding plants. Manual assessment of parameters such as the number of grains per ear and grain size is laborious. One solution to this problem is image-based analysis that can be performed using a desktop PC. Furthermore, the effectiveness of analysis performed in the field can be improved through the use of mobile devices. In this paper, we propose a method for the automated evaluation of phenotypic parameters of grains using mobile devices running the Android operational system. The experimental results show that this approach is efficient and sufficiently accurate for the large-scale analysis of phenotypic characteristics in wheat grains. Evaluation of our application under six different lighting conditions and three mobile devices demonstrated that the lighting of the paper has significant influence on the accuracy of our method, unlike the smartphone type.

Indexed as

Androidcomputer image analysismobile devicesphenotypingwheat grain

Identifiers

PMID28101093
PMCPMC5209368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.