Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28100932›Full record

ArticleRadiologia brasileira

Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice.

Amanda Nogueira de Sá Gonçalves, Marco Aurélio Sousa Sala, Rodrigo Ciotola Bruno, José Alberto Cunha Xavier, João Mauricio Canavezi Indiani, Marcelo Fontalvo Martin, Paulo Maurício Chagas Bruno, Marcelo Souto Nacif

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda Nogueira de Sá GonçalvesPhysician at the Unidade de Radiologia Clínica (URC) and at the Hospital Vivalle/D'Or/São Luiz, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Marco Aurélio Sousa SalaPhysician at the Unidade de Radiologia Clínica (URC) and at the Hospital Vivalle/D'Or/São Luiz, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Rodrigo Ciotola BrunoGeneral Surgeon and Coloproctologist at the Hospital Vivalle/D'Or/São Luiz, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
José Alberto Cunha XavierGeneral Surgeon and Coloproctologist at the Hospital Pio XII, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
João Mauricio Canavezi IndianiPhysician at the Unidade de Radiologia Clínica (URC) and at the Hospital Vivalle/D'Or/São Luiz, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Marcelo Fontalvo MartinPhysician at the Unidade de Radiologia Clínica (URC) and at the Hospital Vivalle/D'Or/São Luiz, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Paulo Maurício Chagas BrunoGeneral Surgeon and Coloproctologist at the Hospital Vivalle/D'Or/São Luiz, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Marcelo Souto NacifAdjunct Professor in the Radiology Department of the Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
D’Or Institute for Research and Education · BRUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to profile patients who undergo defecography, by age and gender, as well as to describe the main imaging and diagnostic findings in this population. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a retrospective, descriptive study of 39 patients, conducted between January 2012 and February 2014. The patients were evaluated in terms of age, gender, and diagnosis. They were stratified by age, and continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. All possible quantitative defecography variables were evaluated, including rectal evacuation, perineal descent, and measures of the anal canal.

resultsThe majority (95%) of the patients were female. Patient ages ranged from 18 to 82 years (mean age, 52 ± 13 years): 10 patients were under 40 years of age; 18 were between 40 and 60 years of age; and 11 were over 60 years of age. All 39 of the patients evaluated had abnormal radiological findings. The most prevalent diagnoses were rectocele (in 77%) and enterocele (in 38%). Less prevalent diagnoses were vaginal prolapse, uterine prolapse, and Meckel's diverticulum (in 2%, for all).

conclusionAlthough defecography is performed more often in women, both genders can benefit from the test. Defecography can be performed in order to detect complex disorders such as uterine and rectal prolapse, as well as to detect basic clinical conditions such as rectocele or enterocele.

Indexed as

ConstipationDefecographyRectal prolapseRectocele

Identifiers

PMID28100932
PMCPMC5238412
OpenAlexW2522262862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.