Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28100789›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2017

Complex Evolutionary History of the Mammalian Histone H1.1-H1.5 Gene Family.

Inma Ponte, Devani Romero, Daniel Yero, Pedro Suau, Alicia Roque

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reprogramming of the epigenome in neurodevelopmental disorders.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Histone H1 Post-Translational Modifications: Update and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Inma PonteDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Biociencias, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Devani RomeroDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Biociencias, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Daniel YeroInstituto de Biotecnología y de Biomedicina (IBB) y Departamento de Genética y Microbiología, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Pedro SuauDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Biociencias, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alicia RoqueDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Biociencias, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

H1 is involved in chromatin higher-order structure and gene regulation. H1 has a tripartite structure. The central domain is stably folded in solution, while the N- and C-terminal domains are intrinsically disordered. The terminal domains are encoded by DNA of low sequence complexity, and are thus prone to short insertions/deletions (indels). We have examined the evolution of the H1.1-H1.5 gene family from 27 mammalian species. Multiple sequence alignment has revealed a strong preferential conservation of the number and position of basic residues among paralogs, suggesting that overall H1 basicity is under a strong purifying selection. The presence of a conserved pattern of indels, ancestral to the splitting of mammalian orders, in the N- and C-terminal domains of the paralogs, suggests that slippage may have favored the rapid divergence of the subtypes and that purifying selection has maintained this pattern because it is associated with function. Evolutionary analyses have found evidences of positive selection events in H1.1, both before and after the radiation of mammalian orders. Positive selection ancestral to mammalian radiation involved changes at specific sites that may have contributed to the low relative affinity of H1.1 for chromatin. More recent episodes of positive selection were detected at codon positions encoding amino acids of the C-terminal domain of H1.1, which may modulate the folding of the CTD. The detection of putative recombination points in H1.1-H1.5 subtypes suggests that this process may has been involved in the acquisition of the tripartite H1 structure.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsBiological EvolutionChromatinCodonDNAEvolution, MolecularHistonesINDEL MutationMammalsSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNAStructure-Activity RelationshipChromatinCodonDNAHistonesfunctional differentiationhistone H1insertions/deletionsmaximum-likelihood analysispositive selection.recombination

Identifiers

PMID28100789
PMCPMC5400378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.