Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28100742›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

Visual Sampling Predicts Hippocampal Activity.

Zhong-Xu Liu, Kelly Shen, Rosanna K Olsen, Jennifer D Ryan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Positive and Negative Retinotopic Codes in the Human Hippocampus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Anticipatory eye gaze as a marker of memory.Communications psychology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Dynamic interactions between memory and viewing behaviors: Insights from dyadic modeling of eye movements.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhong-Xu LiuRotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M6A 2E1, and zliu@research.baycrest.org.
Kelly ShenRotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M6A 2E1, and.
Rosanna K OlsenRotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M6A 2E1, and.ORCID 0000-0002-2918-4152
Jennifer D RyanRotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M6A 2E1, and.ORCID 0000-0001-9244-7851
Baycrest Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eye movements serve to accumulate information from the visual world, contributing to the formation of coherent memory representations that support cognition and behavior. The hippocampus and the oculomotor network are well connected anatomically through an extensive set of polysynaptic pathways. However, the extent to which visual sampling behavior is related to functional responses in the hippocampus during encoding has not been studied directly in human neuroimaging. In the current study, participants engaged in a face processing task while brain responses were recorded with fMRI and eye movements were monitored simultaneously. The number of gaze fixations that a participant made on a given trial was correlated significantly with hippocampal activation such that more fixations were associated with stronger hippocampal activation. Similar results were also found in the fusiform face area, a face-selective perceptual processing region. Notably, the number of fixations was associated with stronger hippocampal activation when the presented faces were novel, but not when the faces were repeated. Increases in fixations during viewing of novel faces also led to larger repetition-related suppression in the hippocampus, indicating that this fixation-hippocampal relationship may reflect the ongoing development of lasting representations. Together, these results provide novel empirical support for the idea that visual exploration and hippocampal binding processes are inherently linked. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The hippocampal and oculomotor networks have each been studied extensively for their roles in the binding of information and gaze function, respectively. Despite the evidence that individuals with amnesia whose damage includes the hippocampus show alterations in their eye movement patterns and recent findings that the two systems are anatomically connected, it has not been demonstrated whether visual exploration is related to hippocampal activity in neurologically intact adults. In this combined fMRI-eye-tracking study, we show how hippocampal responses scale with the number of gaze fixations made during viewing of novel, but not repeated, faces. These findings provide new evidence suggesting that the hippocampus plays an important role in the binding of information, as sampled by gaze fixations, during visual exploration.

Indexed as

AdultEye MovementsFemaleForecastingHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationYoung Adulteye movementsgaze fixationshippocampusmemory encodingoculomotor systemvisual exploration

Identifiers

PMID28100742
PMCPMC6596763
OpenAlexW2560102621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.