Trial reportThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2017
High-dose rifampicin, moxifloxacin, and SQ109 for treating tuberculosis: a multi-arm, multi-stage randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 214 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multiple Arm, Multiple Stage, Phase 2, OL, Randomized, Controlled Trial to Evaluate 4 Treatment Regimens of SQ109, Increased Doses of Rifampicin, and Moxifloxacin in Adults With Newly Diagnosed, Smear-positive Pulmonary Tuberculosis
A Randomized, Four-arm Open Label Phase Two-b Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety/Tolerability and Efficacy of High Dose Rifampicin in TB-HIV Co-infected Patients on Efavirenz- or Dolutegravir-based Antiretroviral Therapy
2R2: Higher Dose Rifampin for 2 Months vs Standard Dose Rifampin for Latent TB: a 3-arm Randomized Trial.
A Pragmatic Trial With Optimized Dose of Rifampicin and Moxifloxacin for the Treatment of Drug Susceptible Pulmonary Tuberculosis
Who cites it
214 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 382 citations in OpenAlex.
- A clinical practice guideline for tuberculous meningitis.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2026Guideline
- Comparative efficacy and safety of high-dose rifamycin regimens for tuberculosis treatment: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2025Pooled it
- Safety of Triple-Dose Rifampin in Tuberculosis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy & safety of high-dose rifampicin in pulmonary tuberculosis: A systematic review & meta-analysis.The Indian journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Tryptophan and Its Derived Metabolites as Biomarkers for Tuberculosis Disease: A Systematic ReviewIranian biomedical journal · 2024Pooled it
- Methodology and design of platform trials: a meta-epidemiological study.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2023Pooled it
- Treatment Effect Measures for Culture Conversion Endpoints in Phase IIb Tuberculosis Treatment Trials.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021Pooled it
- Pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral and tuberculosis drugs in children with HIV/TB co-infection: a systematic review.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2020Pooled it
- Model-Based Meta-analysis of Rifampicin Exposure and Mortality in Indonesian Tuberculous Meningitis Trials.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020Pooled it
- Shortened treatment regimens versus the standard regimen for drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Diabetes mellitus comorbidity in patients enrolled in tuberculosis drug efficacy trials around the world: A systematic review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Pooled it
- Pharmacokinetics of rifampicin in adult TB patients and healthy volunteers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2018Pooled it
- Assessing the efficacy of high-dose rifampicin plus albendazole against onchocerciasis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Trial
- Immediate or high-dose antituberculosis therapy for HIV-related sepsis in Tanzania and Uganda (ATLAS): a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled, 2 × 2 factorial, superiority trial.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2026Trial
- Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Standard- and High-Dose Rifampicin for Tuberculosis Preventive Therapy in the 2R2 Randomized Controlled Trial.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Trial
- High-Dose Rifampicin Plus Albendazole Rapidly Clears Lymphatic Filariasis Circulating Filarial Antigen in a Randomised Clinical Trial: A Promising Step Toward Short-Course Macrofilaricidal Therapy.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Trial
- Model-based evaluation of the interaction between ritonavir-boosted atazanavir and rifampicin in Ugandan adults with HIV.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Trial
- Efficacy and safety of 8-week regimens for the treatment of rifampicin-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis (TRUNCATE-TB): a prespecified exploratory analysis of a multi-arm, multi-stage, open-label, randomised controlled trial.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2025Trial
- Intensified Treatment of Tuberculous Meningitis in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Trial
- Impact of Pharmacogenetics on Pharmacokinetics of First-Line Antituberculosis Drugs in the HIRIF Trial.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2025Trial
154 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
30 authors at 15 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTuberculosis is the world's leading infectious disease killer. We aimed to identify shorter, safer drug regimens for the treatment of tuberculosis.
methodsWe did a randomised controlled, open-label trial with a multi-arm, multi-stage design. The trial was done in seven sites in South Africa and Tanzania, including hospitals, health centres, and clinical trial centres. Patients with newly diagnosed, rifampicin-sensitive, previously untreated pulmonary tuberculosis were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1:2 ratio to receive (all orally) either 35 mg/kg rifampicin per day with 15-20 mg/kg ethambutol, 20 mg/kg rifampicin per day with 400 mg moxifloxacin, 20 mg/kg rifampicin per day with 300 mg SQ109, 10 mg/kg rifampicin per day with 300 mg SQ109, or a daily standard control regimen (10 mg/kg rifampicin, 5 mg/kg isoniazid, 25 mg/kg pyrazinamide, and 15-20 mg/kg ethambutol). Experimental treatments were given with oral 5 mg/kg isoniazid and 25 mg/kg pyrazinamide per day for 12 weeks, followed by 14 weeks of 5 mg/kg isoniazid and 10 mg/kg rifampicin per day. Because of the orange discoloration of body fluids with higher doses of rifampicin it was not possible to mask patients and clinicians to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was time to culture conversion in liquid media within 12 weeks. Patients without evidence of rifampicin resistance on phenotypic test who took at least one dose of study treatment and had one positive culture on liquid or solid media before or within the first 2 weeks of treatment were included in the primary analysis (modified intention to treat). Time-to-event data were analysed using a Cox proportional-hazards regression model and adjusted for minimisation variables. The proportional hazard assumption was tested using Schoelfeld residuals, with threshold p<0·05 for non-proportionality. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01785186).
findingsBetween May 7, 2013, and March 25, 2014, we enrolled and randomly assigned 365 patients to different treatment arms (63 to rifampicin 35 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol; 59 to rifampicin 10 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, SQ109; 57 to rifampicin 20 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and SQ109; 63 to rifampicin 10 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and moxifloxacin; and 123 to the control arm). Recruitment was stopped early in the arms containing SQ109 since prespecified efficacy thresholds were not met at the planned interim analysis. Time to stable culture conversion in liquid media was faster in the 35 mg/kg rifampicin group than in the control group (median 48 days vs 62 days, adjusted hazard ratio 1·78; 95% CI 1·22-2·58, p=0·003), but not in other experimental arms. There was no difference in any of the groups in time to culture conversion on solid media. 11 patients had treatment failure or recurrent disease during post-treatment follow-up: one in the 35 mg/kg rifampicin arm and none in the moxifloxacin arm. 45 (12%) of 365 patients reported grade 3-5 adverse events, with similar proportions in each arm.
interpretationA dose of 35 mg/kg rifampicin was safe, reduced the time to culture conversion in liquid media, and could be a promising component of future, shorter regimens. Our adaptive trial design was successfully implemented in a multi-centre, high tuberculosis burden setting, and could speed regimen development at reduced cost.
fundingThe study was funded by the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials partnership (EDCTP), the German Ministry for Education and Research (BmBF), and the Medical Research Council UK (MRC).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.