Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28100412›Full record

ArticleBiologicals : journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization2017

Virome of US bovine calf serum.

Mohammadreza Sadeghi, Beatrix Kapusinszky, Danielle M Yugo, Tung Gia Phan, Xutao Deng, Isis Kanevsky, Tanja Opriessnig, Amelia R Woolums, David J Hurley, Xiang-Jin Meng and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biologicals : journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Two bovine hepacivirus genome sequences from U.S. cattle.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohammadreza SadeghiBlood Systems Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Virology, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Beatrix KapusinszkyBlood Systems Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Danielle M YugoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Tung Gia PhanBlood Systems Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Xutao DengBlood Systems Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Isis KanevskyDepartment of Dairy Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Tanja OpriessnigThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland, UK.
Amelia R WoolumsDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, MS, USA.
David J HurleyDepartment of Population Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Xiang-Jin MengDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Eric DelwartBlood Systems Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: delwarte@medicine.ucsf.edu.
Blood Systems Research Institute · USVirginia–Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine · USMississippi State University · USRoslin Institute · GBUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Georgia · USUniversity of Helsinki · FIVirginia Tech · US

Funding

Metagenomic detection of emerging viruses in the blood supplyR01HL105770 · NHLBI · VITALANT · PI DELWART, ERIC L · 2011 to 2015
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using viral metagenomics we analyzed four bovine serum pools assembled from 715 calves in the United States. Two parvoviruses, bovine parvovirus 2 (BPV2) and a previously uncharacterized parvovirus designated as bosavirus (BosaV), were detected in 3 and 4 pools respectively and their complete coding sequences generated. Based on NS1 protein identity, bosavirus qualifies as a member of a new species in the copiparvovirus genus. Also detected were low number of reads matching ungulate tetraparvovirus 2, bovine hepacivirus, and several papillomaviruses. This study further characterizes the diversity of viruses in calf serum with the potential to infect fetuses and through fetal bovine serum contaminate cell cultures.

Indexed as

AnimalsBocavirusCapsid ProteinsCattleGenome, ViralGeographyMetagenomicsParvoviridae InfectionsPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNASerumSpecies SpecificityUnited StatesViral Nonstructural ProteinsCapsid ProteinsViral Nonstructural ProteinsBosavirusCell cultureMetagenomicsParvovirus

Identifiers

PMID28100412
PMCPMC5654489
OpenAlexW2573006444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.