Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28100112›Full record

ArticleCulture, health & sexuality2017

Abortion attitudes among South Africans: findings from the 2013 social attitudes survey.

Elizabeth A Mosley, Elizabeth J King, Amy J Schulz, Lisa H Harris, Nicole De Wet, Barbara A Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Culture, health & sexuality, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. "Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth A Mosleya Department of Health Behaviour and Health Education , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.
Elizabeth J Kinga Department of Health Behaviour and Health Education , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.
Amy J Schulza Department of Health Behaviour and Health Education , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.
Lisa H Harrisc Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.
Nicole De Wetd Department of Demography and Population Studies , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg-Braamfontein , South Africa.
Barbara A Andersonb Population Studies Center , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

Strategic Vision & Impact on Environmental HealthP30ES017885 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI John D. Meeker · 2011 to 2026
$21.5M
Population Studies Center Infrastructure GrantR24HD041028 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MORENOFF, JEFFREY D · 2001 to 2016
$13.2M
Scientific/Technical CoreP2CHD041028 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Sarah A. Burgard · 2017 to 2026
$6.5M
Community Action to Promote Healthy EnvironmentsR01ES032389 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BATTERMAN, STUART A, SCHULZ, AMY J · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041028NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041028NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES017885NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES032389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abortion is legal in South Africa, but over half of abortions remain unsafe there. Evidence suggests women who are (Black) African, of lower socioeconomic status, living with HIV, or residents of Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, or Limpopo provinces are disproportionately vulnerable to morbidity or mortality from unsafe abortion. Negative attitudes toward abortion have been documented in purposively sampled studies, yet it remains unclear what attitudes exist nationally or whether they differ across sociodemographic groups, with implications for inequities in service accessibility and health. In the current study, we analysed nationally representative data from 2013 to estimate the prevalence of negative abortion attitudes in South Africa and to identify racial, socioeconomic and geographic differences. More respondents felt abortion was 'always wrong' in the case of family poverty (75.4%) as compared to foetal anomaly (55%), and over half of respondents felt abortion was 'always wrong' in both cases (52.5%). Using binary logistic regression models, we found significantly higher odds of negative abortion attitudes among non-Xhosa African and Coloured respondents (compared to Xhosa respondents), those with primary education or less, and residents of Gauteng and Limpopo (compared to Western Cape). We contextualise and discuss these findings using a human rights-based approach to health.

Indexed as

Social StigmaAbortion, LegalBlack PeopleEthnicityFemaleHIV SeropositivityHumansPovertyPregnancySouth AfricaAbortion attitudesabortion stigmasociodemographicsSouth Africaunsafe abortion

Identifiers

PMID28100112
PMCPMC5849464
OpenAlexW2579861219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.