Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28100040›Full record

ReviewStem cells (Dayton, Ohio)2017

Concise Review: Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Research in the Era of Precision Medicine.

Takashi Hamazaki, Nihal El Rouby, Natalie C Fredette, Katherine E Santostefano, Naohiro Terada

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Precision medicine journey through omics approach.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Takashi HamazakiDepartment of Pediatrics, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Nihal El RoubyDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, and Center for Pharmacogenomics, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Natalie C FredetteDepartment of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, and Center for Cellular Reprogramming, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Katherine E SantostefanoDepartment of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, and Center for Cellular Reprogramming, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Naohiro TeradaDepartment of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, and Center for Cellular Reprogramming, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
Genetic Regulation of Human Beta Cell DestructionUC4DK104194 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MATHEWS, CLAYTON E · 2014 to 2014
$3.1M
Training Program in Regenerative MedicineT32DK074367 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SCOTT, EDWARD W · 2007 to 2022
$2.9M
A Stem Cell Tactic to Promote Personalized MedicineR24GM119977 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI TERADA, NAOHIRO · 2016 to 2018
$1.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK074367NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK104194NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM119977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in DNA sequencing technologies are revealing how human genetic variations associate with differential health risks, disease susceptibilities, and drug responses. Such information is now expected to help evaluate individual health risks, design personalized health plans and treat patients with precision. It is still challenging, however, to understand how such genetic variations cause the phenotypic alterations in pathobiologies and treatment response. Human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technologies are emerging as a promising strategy to fill the knowledge gaps between genetic association studies and underlying molecular mechanisms. Breakthroughs in genome editing technologies and continuous improvement in iPSC differentiation techniques are particularly making this research direction more realistic and practical. Pioneering studies have shown that iPSCs derived from a variety of monogenic diseases can faithfully recapitulate disease phenotypes in vitro when differentiated into disease-relevant cell types. It has been shown possible to partially recapitulate disease phenotypes, even with late onset and polygenic diseases. More recently, iPSCs have been shown to validate effects of disease and treatment-related single nucleotide polymorphisms identified through genome wide association analysis. In this review, we will discuss how iPSC research will further contribute to human health in the coming era of precision medicine. Stem Cells 2017;35:545-550.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineStem Cell ResearchAnimalsGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideExperimental modelsGenomicsInduced pluripotent stem cells

Identifiers

PMID28100040
PMCPMC5915333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.